From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/16] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 09:50:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260201175050.468601-16-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260201175050.468601-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Remove a test in test_maps that checks if the updating of the percpu
counter in task local storage map is preemption safe as the percpu
counter is now removed.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c | 128 ------------------
.../bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c | 38 ------
2 files changed, 166 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a4121d2248ac..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* Copyright (C) 2022. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
-#define _GNU_SOURCE
-#include <sched.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <stdbool.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <string.h>
-#include <pthread.h>
-
-#include <bpf/bpf.h>
-#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
-
-#include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "test_maps.h"
-#include "task_local_storage_helpers.h"
-#include "read_bpf_task_storage_busy.skel.h"
-
-struct lookup_ctx {
- bool start;
- bool stop;
- int pid_fd;
- int map_fd;
- int loop;
-};
-
-static void *lookup_fn(void *arg)
-{
- struct lookup_ctx *ctx = arg;
- long value;
- int i = 0;
-
- while (!ctx->start)
- usleep(1);
-
- while (!ctx->stop && i++ < ctx->loop)
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(ctx->map_fd, &ctx->pid_fd, &value);
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static void abort_lookup(struct lookup_ctx *ctx, pthread_t *tids, unsigned int nr)
-{
- unsigned int i;
-
- ctx->stop = true;
- ctx->start = true;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
- pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
-}
-
-void test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(void)
-{
-#define MAX_NR_THREAD 4096
- unsigned int i, nr = 256, loop = 8192, cpu = 0;
- struct read_bpf_task_storage_busy *skel;
- pthread_t tids[MAX_NR_THREAD];
- struct lookup_ctx ctx;
- cpu_set_t old, new;
- const char *cfg;
- int err;
-
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_THREAD");
- if (cfg) {
- nr = atoi(cfg);
- if (nr > MAX_NR_THREAD)
- nr = MAX_NR_THREAD;
- }
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP");
- if (cfg)
- loop = atoi(cfg);
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_PIN_CPU");
- if (cfg)
- cpu = atoi(cfg);
-
- skel = read_bpf_task_storage_busy__open_and_load();
- err = libbpf_get_error(skel);
- CHECK(err, "open_and_load", "error %d\n", err);
-
- /* Only for a fully preemptible kernel */
- if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPTION) {
- printf("%s SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPTION)\n", __func__);
- read_bpf_task_storage_busy__destroy(skel);
- skips++;
- return;
- }
-
- /* Save the old affinity setting */
- sched_getaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(old), &old);
-
- /* Pinned on a specific CPU */
- CPU_ZERO(&new);
- CPU_SET(cpu, &new);
- sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(new), &new);
-
- ctx.start = false;
- ctx.stop = false;
- ctx.pid_fd = sys_pidfd_open(getpid(), 0);
- ctx.map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.task);
- ctx.loop = loop;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- err = pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, lookup_fn, &ctx);
- if (err) {
- abort_lookup(&ctx, tids, i);
- CHECK(err, "pthread_create", "error %d\n", err);
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- ctx.start = true;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
- pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
-
- skel->bss->pid = getpid();
- err = read_bpf_task_storage_busy__attach(skel);
- CHECK(err, "attach", "error %d\n", err);
-
- /* Trigger program */
- sys_gettid();
- skel->bss->pid = 0;
-
- CHECK(skel->bss->busy != 0, "bad bpf_task_storage_busy", "got %d\n", skel->bss->busy);
-out:
- read_bpf_task_storage_busy__destroy(skel);
- /* Restore affinity setting */
- sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(old), &old);
- printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
-}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 69da05bb6c63..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* Copyright (C) 2022. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
-#include "vmlinux.h"
-#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
-#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
-
-extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPTION __kconfig __weak;
-extern const int bpf_task_storage_busy __ksym;
-
-char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-
-int pid = 0;
-int busy = 0;
-
-struct {
- __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
- __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
- __type(key, int);
- __type(value, long);
-} task SEC(".maps");
-
-SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
-int BPF_PROG(read_bpf_task_storage_busy)
-{
- int *value;
-
- if (!CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
- return 0;
-
- if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
- return 0;
-
- value = bpf_this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_task_storage_busy);
- if (value)
- busy = *value;
-
- return 0;
-}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-01 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-01 17:50 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/16] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/16] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink " Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/16] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/16] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/16] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/16] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/16] bpf: Prepare for bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/16] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-02-01 18:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-04 5:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-04 23:14 ` Amery Hung
2026-02-05 1:08 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/16] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2026-02-04 1:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-04 23:20 ` Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/16] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2026-02-01 17:50 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-02-01 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/16] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2026-02-01 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/16] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260201175050.468601-16-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox