From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B328280335 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2026 17:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769968256; cv=none; b=Y5ZaTE64zFJmfxSjoglt/zmLk30trPvlx7Yfxi+8dMKn0rAB1MBOT44Eiv2DylCYEGsi5/1rCkduBNrndh7FnKan2eGJnB48O9+XYfah97XFHODo5AWYMcYmHeeF3vQ8BD084NozwP4MqdkKwBOhIrzyPZaVVZaOikolVOWCIPA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769968256; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+qPw4038eS2y9kHNs6zcJcVnfSIT1Z4cjnQ1bz/GUeU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=PHNyvhJdNnK1mAsQGk4oMlAUowrWg2jgxctYzC9fW8AytcIIEbH4RznNuC7zW8Nxnlgp3WW+Veam6qw7WIQBaqIqNgcUnyBjAeCY5CsuNeivL48dERY4Vt+HdSePrd5GrBkQnvI0TFYwqQMVDJpRLZm9+Qmz8wICRdXDik1zO7I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=aY256FMS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="aY256FMS" Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a07fac8aa1so27432455ad.1 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:50:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1769968255; x=1770573055; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cUj0HFkDrL7UYCdDezay2A0SQorq6cGviwCSfX9SRxA=; b=aY256FMSBKW+o47a00gVj/1fNbC/7OYVjiDHBWZ1bc43Nq9HGs37ybCwR/VmPtOtkn g4k1f6lrY9/IzJlzGYfrtpmILEbGOk+ZnEN+uL9ZtUpxNRMP54ESw+09fhKGWdZCJQrx 2L7ti+1x8pQIIWARv6RvbtfkmzMbt9AMoR9BXG25b6SwOfjnN/u2QssOF4o28cur9NR2 wWvh7ljIiXbBn7sujA+QQ55RqgxnDMEBtwZtfncBsFqe8GbLfbjAQcQ6UBOVtUwSurLz yozjZOWWlZ4ypR/+zY5u2/X9lstzQ7RA1X/0IgODlMc4T2Cd6K/0Dex/W0s1JPBrXXa4 vAPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769968255; x=1770573055; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cUj0HFkDrL7UYCdDezay2A0SQorq6cGviwCSfX9SRxA=; b=EOWKHEJuDZhxlgNtjKTofZ0ZP8sEeznqYCTCZHt+Fz8A5sxVz72/sb/w7rK0512ERX xVk7UhaHBBmHGOl+6hbdu6Dfv5wRfYd5zuwAJ/B/e0auXNZBH1fyuoaBaXM9sVLjoZPp enzLO6KS2KZbod2j1dpgJmA0QEY6fgPd7FlJBm/1rTk8Azv4blFDLu85QWRQSPymBXxR jwlhAvE3VndaW9x+mGb6iK7t6NtgJEIT/LXbgGNl+eNLZT3kpDbI75PHdsQXnWm+hZHE RCF88pwYe3WPFxFfLvpHRAXxLv/gLvxo37e+fOdArw3xFMEsQktyTHY/nuCj0bmhaveS fNWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwwZHPSbCnjuxmltzBpazGIN2nJY7xLLVIaKO6qpvESTB90/tzq GXbHV1b4xXmO7fscJwuetMyezVL1JYPoqC4fxh2ZVRdbN/bFUxUZF96B X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aKoSdcwjJscD2iRypYeS4d3l/eR9qvRvQVsT8Fteujxf+kI23QVNutTdJl/gJi DHZE5RhdqR4+Og7LzY/NCKC/B2PnEi0mS0r2hP2fsLINtFufIC+u5YZP+P9vHf1q1u8obDPrxYm iR0EMbBWBK+fmIvalC5WuUbf901FL59xPcJ1uYlCslfu0QL2B5dmSxAVg62V9D8K3qR55KhNxaA VKu64UQdODLTSarcDlEwxlz2dk7W+nHljjugIiHNKP12Yf6pXX+w4GtggZ8cwsxptRxi2ze3tTZ Puma+Sa/bpumJAK4524wH3tiVpJRJNqGlAtvzIptzg0opKvBXdvdLoK34Cj+6Ce1YZnLT8n4V2s NHKfrTkhqXw/QTV5trcJH/tUZFFILX4tqdzde8j5Cq/labEflRfUkEVECM6OOK1iFie1cWH2itZ f3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1104:b0:2a7:9ded:9b43 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a8d7eedc73mr92205855ad.26.1769968254551; Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:ff:2::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2a88b3eecc5sm130288655ad.17.2026.02.01.09.50.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:50:54 -0800 (PST) From: Amery Hung To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com, ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 09:50:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20260201175050.468601-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260201175050.468601-1-ameryhung@gmail.com> References: <20260201175050.468601-1-ameryhung@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To prepare for changing bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock to rqspinlock, convert bpf_selem_unlink_map() to failable. It still always succeeds and returns 0 for now. Since some operations updating local storage cannot fail in the middle, open-code bpf_selem_unlink_map() to take the b->lock before the operation. There are two such locations: - bpf_local_storage_alloc() The first selem will be unlinked from smap if cmpxchg owner_storage_ptr fails, which should not fail. Therefore, hold b->lock when linking until allocation complete. Helpers that assume b->lock is held by callers are introduced: bpf_selem_link_map_nolock() and bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(). - bpf_local_storage_update() The three step update process: link_map(new_selem), link_storage(new_selem), and unlink_map(old_selem) should not fail in the middle. In bpf_selem_unlink(), bpf_selem_unlink_map() and bpf_selem_unlink_storage() should either all succeed or fail as a whole instead of failing in the middle. So, return if unlink_map() failed. Remove the selem_linked_to_map_lockless() check as an selem in the common paths (not bpf_local_storage_map_free() or bpf_local_storage_destroy()), will be unlinked under b->lock and local_storage->lock and therefore no other threads can unlink the selem from map at the same time. In bpf_local_storage_destroy(), ignore the return of bpf_selem_unlink_map() for now. A later patch will allow bpf_local_storage_destroy() to unlink selems even when failing to acquire locks. Note that while this patch removes all callers of selem_linked_to_map(), a later patch that introduces bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() will use it again. Signed-off-by: Amery Hung --- kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c index 91b28f4e3130..5f7869078c4f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c @@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static bool selem_linked_to_storage(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->snode); } -static bool selem_linked_to_map_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) -{ - return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->map_node); -} - static bool selem_linked_to_map(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) { return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->map_node); @@ -347,25 +342,28 @@ void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage, hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->snode, &local_storage->list); } -static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) +/* Only called in common paths */ +static int bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) { struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage; struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap; struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b; unsigned long flags; - if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem))) - /* selem has already be unlinked from smap */ - return; - local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage, bpf_rcu_lock_held()); smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held()); b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags); - if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem))) - hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags); + + return 0; +} + +static void bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) +{ + hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node); } void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, @@ -381,13 +379,24 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags); } +static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b, + struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem) +{ + hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list); +} + void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now) { + int err; + /* Always unlink from map before unlinking from local_storage * because selem will be freed after successfully unlinked from * the local_storage. */ - bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem); + err = bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem); + if (err) + return; + bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, reuse_now); } @@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner, { struct bpf_local_storage *prev_storage, *storage; struct bpf_local_storage **owner_storage_ptr; + struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b; + unsigned long flags; int err; err = mem_charge(smap, owner, sizeof(*storage)); @@ -453,7 +464,10 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner, storage->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock; bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem); - bpf_selem_link_map(smap, storage, first_selem); + + b = select_bucket(smap, storage); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags); + bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, first_selem); owner_storage_ptr = (struct bpf_local_storage **)owner_storage(smap, owner); @@ -469,10 +483,12 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner, */ prev_storage = cmpxchg(owner_storage_ptr, NULL, storage); if (unlikely(prev_storage)) { - bpf_selem_unlink_map(first_selem); + bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(first_selem); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags); err = -EAGAIN; goto uncharge; } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags); return 0; @@ -494,8 +510,9 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, struct bpf_local_storage_data *old_sdata = NULL; struct bpf_local_storage_elem *alloc_selem, *selem = NULL; struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage; + struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b; HLIST_HEAD(old_selem_free_list); - unsigned long flags; + unsigned long flags, b_flags; int err; /* BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST cannot be both set */ @@ -579,20 +596,25 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, goto unlock; } + b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, b_flags); + alloc_selem = NULL; /* First, link the new selem to the map */ - bpf_selem_link_map(smap, local_storage, selem); + bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, selem); /* Second, link (and publish) the new selem to local_storage */ bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(local_storage, selem); /* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */ if (old_sdata) { - bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata)); + bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(SELEM(old_sdata)); bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata), &old_selem_free_list); } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, b_flags); unlock: raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags); bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false); -- 2.47.3