public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhiping Zhang <zhipingz@meta.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Yochai Cohen <yochai@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Zhiping Zhang <zhipingz@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] Set steering-tag directly for PCIe P2P memory access
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 22:04:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202060433.2341252-1-zhipingz@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128165739.GQ1641016@ziepe.ca>

On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:57:39 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> > Thanks Jason.
> >
> > We already have an end-to-end workflow around dmah (perftest → rdma-core → kernel)
> > to carry the TPH hint, across multiple patch sets. References:
> >  https://github.com/linux-rdma/perftest/commit/98bfb3679a1e71ec96df6a6d6c8124ac66ebce25
> >  https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/1623/commits
> >  https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1752752567.git.leon@kernel.org/
> >
> > Given that, I’d like to minimize churn and use the existing dmah-based flow, while
> > addressing the CPU-memory protection concern you raised. Would you be open to
> > reconsidering this approach?
>
> You would need to initialize the dmah from the dmabuf and then lock it
> to only be usable with that dmabuf. It doesn't avoid any dmabuf work,
> it just makes the whole flow more convoluted.
>
> Jason

Thanks, I see your point. I’ll send a new revision that doesn’t use dmah.

Zhiping

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13 21:37 [RFC 0/2] Set steering-tag directly for PCIe P2P memory access Zhiping Zhang
2025-11-13 21:37 ` [RFC 1/2] " Zhiping Zhang
2025-11-14 13:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-18  0:50     ` zhipingz
2025-11-24 21:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-12-01 17:43     ` Zhiping Zhang
2025-11-13 21:37 ` [RFC 2/2] " Zhiping Zhang
2025-11-17 16:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-20  7:24     ` Zhiping Zhang
2025-11-20 13:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-04  8:10         ` Zhiping Zhang
2025-12-27 19:22           ` Zhiping Zhang
2026-01-06  0:57             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-13  7:43               ` Zhiping Zhang
2026-01-13 16:49                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-24  1:13                   ` Zhiping Zhang
2026-01-28 16:57                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-02  6:04                       ` Zhiping Zhang [this message]
2026-01-03  5:38 ` [RFC 2/2] [fix] mlx5: modifications for use cases other than CPU Zhiping Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260202060433.2341252-1-zhipingz@meta.com \
    --to=zhipingz@meta.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yochai@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox