public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: wei.fang@nxp.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, frank.li@nxp.com,
	shenwei.wang@nxp.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	hawk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [v5,net-next,06/15] net: fec: add fec_enet_rx_queue_xdp() for XDP path
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2026 14:26:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202142655.1847932-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129103447.1893129-7-wei.fang@nxp.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: fec: add fec_enet_rx_queue_xdp() for XDP path

This commit separates XDP path packet processing from protocol stack
processing by creating a dedicated fec_enet_rx_queue_xdp() function.
The goal is to optimize XDP performance by removing unnecessary code
paths that were interleaved with regular packet processing.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c

[ ... ]

> +static void fec_xdp_drop(struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq,
> +			 struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 sync)
> +{
> +	struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(xdp->data);
> +
> +	page_pool_put_page(rxq->page_pool, page, sync, true);
> +}

[ ... ]

> +static int fec_enet_rx_queue_xdp(struct fec_enet_private *fep, int queue,
> +				 int budget, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{

[ ... ]

> +		switch (act) {
> +		case XDP_PASS:
> +			rxq->stats[RX_XDP_PASS]++;
> +			/* The packet length includes FCS, but we don't want to
> +			 * include that when passing upstream as it messes up
> +			 * bridging applications.
> +			 */
> +			skb = fec_build_skb(fep, rxq, bdp, page, pkt_len);
> +			if (!skb) {
> +				fec_xdp_drop(rxq, &xdp, sync);
> +				trace_xdp_exception(ndev, prog, XDP_PASS);
> +			} else {
> +				napi_gro_receive(&fep->napi, skb);
> +			}
> +			break;

When fec_build_skb() fails, it already returns the page to the page pool
via page_pool_recycle_direct():

    static struct sk_buff *fec_build_skb(...)
    {
        skb = build_skb(page_address(page), ...);
        if (unlikely(!skb)) {
            page_pool_recycle_direct(rxq->page_pool, page);
            ...
            return NULL;
        }
        ...
    }

Calling fec_xdp_drop() after fec_build_skb() returns NULL will return
the same page to the pool a second time. Can this cause page pool
corruption under memory pressure when build_skb() fails?

[ ... ]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 10:34 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/15] net: fec: improve XDP copy mode and add AF_XDP zero-copy support Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/15] net: fec: add fec_txq_trigger_xmit() helper Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/15] net: fec: add fec_rx_error_check() to check RX errors Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/15] net: fec: add rx_shift to indicate the extra bytes padded in front of RX frame Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/15] net: fec: add fec_build_skb() to build a skb Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/15] net: fec: improve fec_enet_rx_queue() Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/15] net: fec: add fec_enet_rx_queue_xdp() for XDP path Wei Fang
2026-02-02 14:26   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-02-03  2:04     ` [v5,net-next,06/15] " Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/15] net: fec: add tx_qid parameter to fec_enet_xdp_tx_xmit() Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/15] net: fec: transmit XDP frames in bulk Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/15] net: fec: remove unnecessary NULL pointer check when clearing TX BD ring Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/15] net: fec: use switch statement to check the type of tx_buf Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/15] net: fec: remove the size parameter from fec_enet_create_page_pool() Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/15] net: fec: move xdp_rxq_info* APIs out of fec_enet_create_page_pool() Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/15] net: fec: add fec_alloc_rxq_buffers_pp() to allocate buffers from page pool Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 14/15] net: fec: improve fec_enet_tx_queue() Wei Fang
2026-01-29 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/15] net: fec: add AF_XDP zero-copy support Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260202142655.1847932-1-horms@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox