From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V7 00/14] devlink and mlx5: Support cross-function rate scheduling
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 20:09:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202200916.2b71ccdc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128112544.1661250-1-tariqt@nvidia.com>
On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:25:30 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> This series by Cosmin and Jiri adds support for cross-function rate
> scheduling in devlink and mlx5.
> See detailed explanation by Cosmin below [1].
I'll apply the trivial patches (3, 5) to avoid the reposts.
Please add driver tests exercising this code, there's high risk
of regressions with all this complexity and nested locking.
What devices will support this? Is CX7 enough to test?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 11:25 [PATCH net-next V7 00/14] devlink and mlx5: Support cross-function rate scheduling Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 01/14] documentation: networking: add shared devlink documentation Tariq Toukan
2026-02-03 3:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-03 9:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-04 3:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 7:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-05 2:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-06 10:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-07 1:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 02/14] devlink: introduce shared devlink instance for PFs on same chip Tariq Toukan
2026-02-03 3:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-03 9:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-04 2:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 7:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-05 2:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 03/14] devlink: Reverse locking order for nested instances Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 04/14] devlink: Add helpers to lock nested-in instances Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 05/14] devlink: Refactor devlink_rate_nodes_check Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 06/14] devlink: Decouple rate storage from associated devlink object Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 07/14] devlink: Add parent dev to devlink API Tariq Toukan
2026-02-03 4:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-11 16:28 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2026-02-11 16:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 08/14] devlink: Allow parent dev for rate-set and rate-new Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 09/14] devlink: Allow rate node parents from other devlinks Tariq Toukan
2026-02-03 4:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 10/14] net/mlx5: Add a shared devlink instance for PFs on same chip Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 11/14] net/mlx5: Expose a function to clear a vport's parent Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 12/14] net/mlx5: Store QoS sched nodes in the sh_devlink Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 13/14] net/mlx5: qos: Support cross-device tx scheduling Tariq Toukan
2026-01-28 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next V7 14/14] net/mlx5: Document devlink rates Tariq Toukan
2026-02-03 4:09 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202200916.2b71ccdc@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox