From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4482B3382F0 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770120574; cv=none; b=J9nLqnSCIVYXvo0bMw8Q3xPbK9/HcQt5jxnnnbugSpzcFw4WbGzBB0JMnlXcbus8I8uREPs51xCUNmZOOzVns0Mu6o8YwM3/GEmm3hfB0UzFXcZSViX4iOoCLBxu32l/4sg4bit5SJDH+PDmUU5QcNmX7ceCUCD1bmMbkxI9gKo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770120574; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o9WdklMmUjU6rzAt1Lr+DDa0Tn56ukclRhC4gKXEbIQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VPtciW1cGRERAAfIFaAD08N9lwczFgBfsJL6TJK9wQlNfK2GFYfr0Rff49SzkHlLfiRwKjzJB28GwHsu9g24wCgJZMNmkinUL6VPrygGZVkRqP25yyJnDsaiGzwLPs6KC06PYDcGNfSpXJv2cKOUFtw3JmtUAvyE1h60n1W5uk4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=jHtjoUFh; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=AlOLPP0q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="jHtjoUFh"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="AlOLPP0q" Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:09:30 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1770120571; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o8wiLi93h7s5nrhIswwZYAfTTdER68dWwImPGQeIWAU=; b=jHtjoUFhfRmZAJSEpHEMFw7lEGy+1McDWLnRRqzVIEI6OrRzX5tLg01pubX7I/Hw+j1ZUi hLY0QI8DKEiEua/A/JbgzaCFIiazzis0KcRWc1v/iyP/qftMHIDlkoOzZ12CpKA32fnshA k5bZZMH6fubtUsHaHm0feDAgh5BCXZahpj65oBx4dj6EmoXqLFx3yDoEUyOHQSU/ReCAhh 3VEOClsaFNt7ntOMGRT+cX9m85HjtC4S6/FJjwITLUil898TF+eDS6MoDshpuDi2WO+dKE ld4Z7MKsPJuH8UVga4uoQ2K51Rt+n++YmCQaN6JG7qFpQhwYEeka3oyzIwE3Bg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1770120571; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o8wiLi93h7s5nrhIswwZYAfTTdER68dWwImPGQeIWAU=; b=AlOLPP0qaWbhjKN77AjJ21+JTFa5LppiZI1veMMefptE770NBl9ldgZ5s9tXoWoEqTpCes /NfkSPCqAZf0sQCQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Felix Maurer Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, jkarrenpalo@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, allison.henderson@oracle.com, petrm@nvidia.com, antonio@openvpn.net, Yoann Congal Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] hsr: Implement more robust duplicate discard for HSR Message-ID: <20260203120930.JjaLfGMy@linutronix.de> References: <07b90a435ed7d3450c1949e3a21910916d8538de.1769093335.git.fmaurer@redhat.com> <20260129144348.CIs44m-d@linutronix.de> <20260202171123.LkzpiAMv@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-02-03 12:08:39 [+0100], Felix Maurer wrote: > > I would get rid of it. There the "official" DECLARE_BITMAP(). If this > > doesn't work just open code it avoiding the macro. > > Alright, I did that in the v3 [1] I sent yesterday. Sorry for not > waiting with that until the end of every discussion. I understood your > reply to 0/9 as a "go" for sending a new version addressing the small > issues (without touching the A/B tracking). Don't worry, I planned to reply earlier but didn't manage. Hope to continue today with your v3. > Thanks, > Felix Sebastian