From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB291E86E for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 03:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770174493; cv=none; b=ROgePUVUh+a7v0MsR9ieDGYy3N7J2Kejd6ZZxOCu0YuyJ5JdfL8B5Ps/pB2voYb5wkl5OEieDNd+fc2DEa+LQfcckStD8oHEYCew3kgC0JmQMm8YOT5rlsILjH8gCmmnCZrKpzgSsrjJb1VHXoGXSqKtGB6C1AtZdWNoy11F4Fs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770174493; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IbOekgSiOz9fatLbIBtKt4h+sxKXahDtpevEP5BSZew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YOJdPJeMt6pWBav7g/MdA83ZEW3czru10T96xa6JuOGe4nj3LNvWw/WldwOL3Uyrou5HHhwYIOeAqDv9h1tQSO6om/lG7dnjNBpjLM2TzYH3PkbGk4rgYFInNQxpIuoSaWD84DsbL/d7jpnMqqI/4L5DEdIXbABkINpT7z4Rr4Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HlqoaHdJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HlqoaHdJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F596C19421; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 03:08:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770174493; bh=IbOekgSiOz9fatLbIBtKt4h+sxKXahDtpevEP5BSZew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HlqoaHdJkTYkHrY0aI/1/5OT0kJmVMPDIbDZ3uyBv4f4hu0QAX+dAdtm3ILWum2gc BKQr/EfP8BoCMpynGs8MfAj3t2dFwUH3RGwtDcGHhCmC/RYQuuxKD6R/BrRLLaJzQH FGM6PKu3V5t2Ft2hZLqxU2o3TQggaeC1BWVwd0ixVN9VC/XVENvAzuniR+McY18nkd /iMW3KB1GnjucoJZR7Um2sC7CVYIuIxFDRrbOMeQEUAgsw0aFYsmL+YsUiQ3wcCDgJ 5fgjz8Pvpwrj95AaVdSem6o4XK/pXuQchUUg7jm9HMIWyx763KeEqJOjZ6VXPZ6iEy ZWaoEII0hEkwA== Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 19:08:11 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Pielech, Adrian" Cc: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [ANN] intel's netdev-ci for i40e Message-ID: <20260203190811.1f9e7530@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:35:11 +0100 Pielech, Adrian wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm pleased to announce that we have set up infrastructure for testing > netdev on our e700 NIC (i40e), which extends our current engagement with > e810 NICs(ice). > > This work plugs into netdev-ci initiative by netdev maintainers to run > kselftests against current proposed net-next-hw branch on real hardware. > > Our results are here: > https://netdev-ci-results.intel.com/i40e-results/results.json > > Human friendly results browser: > https://netdev-ci-results.intel.com/results_browser/index.html?drv=i40e Excellent! Looks like the GRO test result parsing is off, the test cases are reported as for example: gro-test-lro-ipv6-ip-tos # XFAIL Device does not support... Looks like this affects all your runners, I haven't noticed earlier.