From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: lorenzo@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, pabeni@redhat.com,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, lulie@linux.alibaba.com,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, dong100@mucse.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v25,4/6] eea: create/destroy rx,tx queues for netdevice open and stop
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 20:12:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260203201237.35c5f756@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260204040054.1698677-2-kuba@kernel.org>
On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 20:00:55 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > + err = enet_bind_new_q_and_cfg(enet, ctx);
> > + if (err) {
> > + netdev_err(enet->netdev,
> > + "eea reset: bind new queues failed. err %d\n",
> > + err);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > + }
>
> When enet_bind_new_q_and_cfg() fails, what happens to the queues allocated
> by eea_alloc_rxtx_q_mem() at line 289? They're now assigned to ctx->rx and
> ctx->tx but haven't been bound to enet yet.
>
> After eea_netdev_stop() sets enet->started = false, a subsequent call to
> eea_netdev_stop() will return early at line 228 without calling
> eea_free_rxtx_q_mem(). If enet_bind_new_q_and_cfg() fails before binding,
> the queues remain in ctx with no cleanup path.
>
> The comment suggests deferring cleanup to "normal NIC cleanup" but
> eea_net_remove() doesn't call eea_free_rxtx_q_mem(), and future reset
> attempts would allocate new queues without freeing these.
I think AI is slightly confused here but so am I. I don't get where you
free he previous resources in this flow. The "bind_new_q_and_cfg" just
overrides stuff, who frees the old set of rings?
Also as I already mentioned in previous manual review you are not
pre-allocating enough. You should also request necessary extra IRQs
_before_ you start tearing down the old state.
> > +static struct sk_buff *eea_rx_build_split_hdr_skb(struct eea_net_rx *rx,
> > + struct eea_rx_ctx *ctx)
> > +{
> > + struct eea_rx_meta *meta = ctx->meta;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + u32 truesize;
> > +
> > + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rx->enet->edev->dma_dev, meta->hdr_dma,
> > + ctx->hdr_len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > +
> > + skb = napi_alloc_skb(&rx->napi, ctx->hdr_len);
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + truesize = meta->headroom + ctx->len;
> > +
> > + skb_put_data(skb, ctx->meta->hdr_addr, ctx->hdr_len);
> > +
> > + if (ctx->len) {
> > + skb_add_rx_frag(skb, 0, meta->page,
> > + meta->offset + meta->headroom,
> > + ctx->len, truesize);
> > +
> > + eea_consume_rx_buffer(rx, meta, truesize);
> > + }
>
> Is the truesize calculation correct for split header mode? Looking at line
> 255, truesize is calculated as meta->headroom + ctx->len.
>
> In eea_rx_post() at line 500, buffers are allocated with space for
> [headroom][data][tailroom], where tailroom is typically 128 bytes for
> skb_shared_info. The tailroom is reserved but not included in the truesize
> calculation here.
>
> When eea_consume_rx_buffer() advances meta->offset by only
> (headroom + data_len), the reserved tailroom space remains unconsumed. After
> alignment in meta_align_offset(), the next fragment may overlap with the
> previous fragment's tailroom space.
>
> Compare with the non-split header path in eea_rx_build_skb() at line 290,
> which includes shinfo_size in truesize:
>
> truesize = meta->headroom + ctx->len + shinfo_size;
>
> Should the split header path also include meta->tailroom or shinfo_size in
> the truesize calculation?
This one - I think the AI is just confused by how frags work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-04 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 9:06 [PATCH net-next v25 0/6] eea: Add basic driver framework for Alibaba Elastic Ethernet Adaptor Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 1/6] eea: introduce PCI framework Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 2/6] eea: introduce ring and descriptor structures Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 3/6] eea: probe the netdevice and create adminq Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 4/6] eea: create/destroy rx,tx queues for netdevice open and stop Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-04 4:00 ` [net-next,v25,4/6] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 4:12 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-04 11:46 ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-05 2:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-05 1:48 ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-05 2:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 5/6] eea: introduce ethtool support Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-02 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next v25 6/6] eea: introduce callback for ndo_get_stats64 Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-04 4:08 ` [net-next,v25,6/6] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 4:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260203201237.35c5f756@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dong100@mucse.com \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox