From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E27189BB6; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 03:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770260659; cv=none; b=dHUHHnqPHA9Lb342UTM6eMpQw+tSE2ePnclAeMmGSvMH7u979FPD8rL4s8pLOGfNY02O61AQPCcDtrf2hX73TMPdXIK5tHOU3UWJU03M7SfeZSHOU8MjjPivCb4ADR+BUoHnNcohfd2lyAqCmRhuvlt6Ye8IFCsnjtP0Upl2UHU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770260659; c=relaxed/simple; bh=itAwqI/HnZEER01Cdd5m/gLyxM9oIubnur5BPHr4LLo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XsaASGgYg+FJi4gN39NUJHQLlDAyyB0wjTCkYd8UbnKCd60r8NN1am/vNt4kJjdmStrIwF4aW2bLGXPyCC72iMx905keyrbQjvvFDwRVJzSdEY6UWJEfpVH4w4grRSPsyfnTa3JkHiHZZ680y1lV6WO56kSrUxV1sOXzY4YaLJY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K1juI19I; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K1juI19I" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B7E8C19424; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 03:04:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770260658; bh=itAwqI/HnZEER01Cdd5m/gLyxM9oIubnur5BPHr4LLo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K1juI19ILsIB0sw+mrYDKS9iCmXLe5RPoT+X0C3A/9gzsfFXwNK7qKNekai2EU6do N0RXR5bu3jpmQnKUQVoU3boqaSpy5ESHelYoqz0GsWHLHImlB/6xo2XuIZSSEx/BDy SvKGYs8zFoG1LaUEqYyhiRwZIBb2tiznXqhli1bVFJxWhsWFKjrmOWeUUDShBj3aNV mgRMGHyQ2dZDjawS4sg+IYGhHOEkb3e6X32JI3U0MwgahqYoFngRaQWh+L+kEVcZD6 76IhDiWVVg9GeCjswk2HSQQcYbecf+ByBmlgnXOcawdwCLFxvxaBV/duG9GjyEHqqd jy9EgYE165icw== Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 19:04:17 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= , bpf@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us, edumazet@google.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, carges@cloudflare.com, kernel-team@cloudflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint Message-ID: <20260204190417.110f5498@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <177022452988.1827734.5121740962985640333.stgit@firesoul> References: <177022452988.1827734.5121740962985640333.stgit@firesoul> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 04 Feb 2026 18:02:49 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > RFC: Seeking feedback on this refactoring approach. > > This series refactors qdisc drop reason handling by introducing a dedicated > enum qdisc_drop_reason and trace_qdisc_drop tracepoint, providing qdisc > layer drop diagnostics with direct qdisc context visibility. I like this! It will presumably require existing users to migrate over but sooner we do it the fewer users that have to move?