public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2026 23:01:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205070208.186382-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205070208.186382-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

To prepare for changing bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock to rqspinlock,
convert bpf_selem_unlink_map() to failable. It still always succeeds and
returns 0 for now.

Since some operations updating local storage cannot fail in the middle,
open-code bpf_selem_unlink_map() to take the b->lock before the
operation. There are two such locations:

- bpf_local_storage_alloc()

  The first selem will be unlinked from smap if cmpxchg owner_storage_ptr
  fails, which should not fail. Therefore, hold b->lock when linking
  until allocation complete. Helpers that assume b->lock is held by
  callers are introduced: bpf_selem_link_map_nolock() and
  bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock().

- bpf_local_storage_update()

  The three step update process: link_map(new_selem),
  link_storage(new_selem), and unlink_map(old_selem) should not fail in
  the middle.

In bpf_selem_unlink(), bpf_selem_unlink_map() and
bpf_selem_unlink_storage() should either all succeed or fail as a whole
instead of failing in the middle. So, return if unlink_map() failed.
Remove the selem_linked_to_map_lockless() check as an selem in the
common paths (not bpf_local_storage_map_free() or
bpf_local_storage_destroy()), will be unlinked under b->lock and
local_storage->lock and therefore no other threads can unlink the selem
from map at the same time.

In bpf_local_storage_destroy(), ignore the return of
bpf_selem_unlink_map() for now. A later patch will allow
bpf_local_storage_destroy() to unlink selems even when failing to
acquire locks.

Note that while this patch removes all callers of selem_linked_to_map(),
a later patch that introduces bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() will use it
again.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 91b28f4e3130..5f7869078c4f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static bool selem_linked_to_storage(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 	return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->snode);
 }
 
-static bool selem_linked_to_map_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
-{
-	return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->map_node);
-}
-
 static bool selem_linked_to_map(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 {
 	return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->map_node);
@@ -347,25 +342,28 @@ void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
 	hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->snode, &local_storage->list);
 }
 
-static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+/* Only called in common paths */
+static int bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem)))
-		/* selem has already be unlinked from smap */
-		return;
-
 	local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage,
 					      bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
-		hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
+	hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
 }
 
 void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
@@ -381,13 +379,24 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b,
+				      struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
+}
+
 void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	/* Always unlink from map before unlinking from local_storage
 	 * because selem will be freed after successfully unlinked from
 	 * the local_storage.
 	 */
-	bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+	err = bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+	if (err)
+		return;
+
 	bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, reuse_now);
 }
 
@@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage *prev_storage, *storage;
 	struct bpf_local_storage **owner_storage_ptr;
+	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int err;
 
 	err = mem_charge(smap, owner, sizeof(*storage));
@@ -453,7 +464,10 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 	storage->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
 
 	bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem);
-	bpf_selem_link_map(smap, storage, first_selem);
+
+	b = select_bucket(smap, storage);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+	bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, first_selem);
 
 	owner_storage_ptr =
 		(struct bpf_local_storage **)owner_storage(smap, owner);
@@ -469,10 +483,12 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 	 */
 	prev_storage = cmpxchg(owner_storage_ptr, NULL, storage);
 	if (unlikely(prev_storage)) {
-		bpf_selem_unlink_map(first_selem);
+		bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(first_selem);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 		err = -EAGAIN;
 		goto uncharge;
 	}
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -494,8 +510,9 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 	struct bpf_local_storage_data *old_sdata = NULL;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *alloc_selem, *selem = NULL;
 	struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
+	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
 	HLIST_HEAD(old_selem_free_list);
-	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long flags, b_flags;
 	int err;
 
 	/* BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST cannot be both set */
@@ -579,20 +596,25 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
+	b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, b_flags);
+
 	alloc_selem = NULL;
 	/* First, link the new selem to the map */
-	bpf_selem_link_map(smap, local_storage, selem);
+	bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, selem);
 
 	/* Second, link (and publish) the new selem to local_storage */
 	bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(local_storage, selem);
 
 	/* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */
 	if (old_sdata) {
-		bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata));
+		bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(SELEM(old_sdata));
 		bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata),
 						&old_selem_free_list);
 	}
 
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, b_flags);
 unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);
 	bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false);
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05  7:01 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/17] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/17] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-02-05  7:37   ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink " Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/17] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:37   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/17] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/17] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/17] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/17] bpf: Prepare for bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() Amery Hung
2026-02-05 13:43   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-05 13:48   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-05  7:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/17] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/17] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/17] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:37   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/17] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/17] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2026-02-05  7:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/17] selftests/bpf: Fix outdated test on storage->smap Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260205070208.186382-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox