From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D5D33D4F0 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2026 23:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770593457; cv=none; b=BorBcwmta6kFoyIBIYGkf/YRSl/JKSdESuT2+zewcrt+BGs7OQhTRkWuUGijmfPOLdpSmGDNr5wjsf+sDVPUtyjlv7vubCuL0bQjvMrwYmB2yg21S2PKqvu7rSrLuhHTmbX2lwIWEodN6yO7qFPmO7Yhm9gC7QR+IkF2B72Bzz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770593457; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BqBwXlW1DYlKifkNzuD8EgN86/kfJHvciyDW4WXpDPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oWznp4jtlS7nye931k1CXRXSqZPu1r/VwYXufcMQkugsFotTFNwcXzcG4DS55plMmYIIS5EtJTOGKud8MxTWBcafoTMfbCXeD6XnlEd5D2YKlVnByWdxAWtwzZ3PDpuDzB8ZibQhHIvUYEPqZKuN4x3o8tK0bAYq6XYt1l7h0Z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=a/R3LPSp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="a/R3LPSp" Received: from killaraus.ideasonboard.com (2001-14ba-703d-e500--2a1.rev.dnainternet.fi [IPv6:2001:14ba:703d:e500::2a1]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 4B5B582A; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 00:30:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1770593410; bh=BqBwXlW1DYlKifkNzuD8EgN86/kfJHvciyDW4WXpDPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a/R3LPSpkb93wFdSWlOX+/jeCfLOWluI9DhYaiJ+yJSYViQVHcpq2vU/8sQbNM8KW OzgvhCQDj4C29gAhRIz/QUtDJkAZwZ1B0An2C4xXoRtexqrXdGpW4BkrBAeKi/GBLD X7uukJHcWOKAMAPGF88XW8kAiir3KJ3mnbQTR9/M= Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 01:30:54 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Ovidiu Panait , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , Andrew Lunn , Clark Wang , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , Emanuele Ghidoli , Eric Dumazet , Fabio Estevam , Heiner Kallweit , imx@lists.linux.dev, Jakub Kicinski , Kieran Bingham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel , Paolo Abeni , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , Stefan Klug , Wei Fang Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE Message-ID: <20260208233054.GA1987960@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> References: <20260203231832.GB133801@killaraus> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260203231832.GB133801@killaraus> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 01:18:33AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 12:17:06AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 10:23:45PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 08:54:52PM +0200, Ovidiu Panait wrote: > > > > If not, maybe this patch could be merged to add the flag that disables > > > > EEE and I will just send a patch to disable EEE on our platforms as well. > > > > > > We still need the flag to disable EEE for platforms where lpi_intr_o is > > > logically OR'd with the other interrupts, so there's no way to ignore > > > its persistent assertion. > > > > I'll also state that we need both patches, but there's no point pushing > > my original patch (to allow EEE to be disabled) unless Laurent is going > > to also submit a patch to make use of the flag - the EEE disable and > > Laurent's patch needs to be part of a series. We don't merge stuff that > > adds facilities that have no users, because that's been proven time and > > time again to be a recipe for accumulating cruft. > > Sorry for having dropped the ball on this. Your patch arrived just when > I travelled to Japan for a month, and then it got burried in my inbox. > Now that it has resurfaced, and that an issue that prevented i.MX8MP > from booting with v6.19-rc has been fixed, I'll rebase my kernel and > finally fix that problem. Done. https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260208232931.2272237-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com > Once again, thank you for all your help with this issue, you have been > extremely helpful and I'm very grateful. > > > So, at the moment, "net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE" ain't > > going anywhere until there's a patch that makes use of the new flag. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart