From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f196.google.com (mail-dy1-f196.google.com [74.125.82.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8A9145348 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 03:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.196 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770608173; cv=none; b=MqQ+mIvOWGB4JEdARiADBgdc/PKgzQ8h/Q5g+ARP/d137dBkOqDx83i6f7NrsPope/ZuV6IxsVJeY/bSSrT8Pyp9SvTnmNDKFEcfTlMMPjFO+PXTeljVKfGBL3/j9Vyu99S3siqjvdGVaTEPNDyv2/GHDFjmlWgK+bdp7PP3BxE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770608173; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zc5a2hdfGUaainCZYIazPgdSK5gsg+YgecuE6y5Wj48=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=E1Nf0YSP48AAfVV2pLiEj0yBYtoZE5bPCPEF1zKSCMrTC3DuSOEteltTUxFxbZX9Q38gIVSW61Cl1pYCUthub3p/vEsmRtYVXzFPW7V51Cmx01yWA4l6uAlTc6u45a2vmpQWLW1URXb/Cqrlg273Cl55DiKmXZM1TRJSsT/6Pg4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TRp5hS9F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.196 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TRp5hS9F" Received: by mail-dy1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b86671f87eso1998eec.0 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2026 19:36:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1770608173; x=1771212973; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RT02JK91ddCtADJwOpKsEqcnq5cQCb0/NUjhSVNWYnE=; b=TRp5hS9FUw8WAKENpFw/N9oRYvmDvrlHvdHO+WGmvJvaP45wOyoYzqkAQ/dI8Wp/ra wl4xeVlyM+N+dPcbtowGOiqr/N/z3Hp15zChv8ypp1Gslf3AvVDttpFVDK4EALoluzbi Yoh5G6owtko8xouC7nPLX/ju1Ip0/n6T3N9o8Qo6sm/k64Fdu8vV+5LI0sHpUvvyCmTO 9U7j00Goe70ZezX71sIJe1839XTUW+69tuaKURxrswRsJ/9uQE644La2vwgf8YuhrKAW CjHRFBuGXokSE74CqlivSy1veS3ijuGRF1K115fSXpxOCOQLK55PxI/Av2wxVs3b5bol wcwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1770608173; x=1771212973; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RT02JK91ddCtADJwOpKsEqcnq5cQCb0/NUjhSVNWYnE=; b=lJuhH++3srrCr23/871MsXtpVudclFa0AkuIySI/jqNMZWpcAhKbwBl0Aa3vZXeNGS JOl17FErtq+eM82t7796NszDUWnAm2ob2c8H1CECcM9/NKHCNC6WHtCvgxVQWyEAR8id CYa5O9Q8nB4dQPJkcnDjEHnbiBqvKdJ6XyBU7hgO8z8obz7GM0qgtSOwO9AgW46wKdul Zz5G4SsJwtpktzlykY0cjNIowINboJQnIeltDmeXZvp4AvozZp2imf8+Qlo04R/+UTog c3X04NuvSIFru5oj59BIsUWd/YiqMB7LzS/DN6JyLHPekptgdnxdnTqP+rBTlENeuBPd u9nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznSkN6AZ6GD/Bp+/WMZPz10BCv+HvO/H6E45GmoxCiQQldqd0w c+vlhSfmVNn/g0TGNGbp0gL8MeTs3do55wOwNdVmt/GLirdPhUp3wjImR9WhMe5h X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aIj4XHgXdHccM5Ft5t6wJIbuUHf8xlZckFPlBbsmCKwLJgiqlbNiS0u9NQUXVj 6BxF+wmDdfv17U6QlqSO8S4ROh6oYlDD7VQeqJUTHvpEblayh36OrCvL1GyX+QAVyjhB1U9GPjB hS8YA2K8nkgcE4fH2D4SDDVU6WsVFpkbTknWXi6GjCeUTwxdycSPBRZEtrNWwc6C8gIeXInuvZa jpwL3b0J6srynNFFnMlkWaaBJDNJxDsoC83QszIUbK7faXZ5bBJVE2qBdS5fOo9DG1o1CNB2FZt vcfVQGD2hGsWy5G1n9Ss5LNX9p/mmdfBfhUbMGSUmy3dM7qXKpB9hHVG2lCNoA6kQpnLpTgYdnv vzzbZwOTBFF45mXTzMw8S/KT0JcFNgRZT2+zdtv15lHQufxQCRLwvx2Ll1s1SRyMBk2MDvkGp+N qmld12n1jxQufXaw39BBdRTOP2Nlmfs2PyNhDKIhZngV6MaKLyE86w8DdTDYqrMLg1UKlv5sfr+ Sp4c63m4bGwfbvKRQ2peONHXED1bZ2mVmJIji4FRUfgtHV4oc8Mddm6kOp1KwOBOgk54qGak2JL cuZZwW4W X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:6408:b0:2b7:1ef:5867 with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b85647973dmr4275149eec.16.1770608172469; Sun, 08 Feb 2026 19:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ethan-latitude5420.. (host-127-120.cafrjco.fresno.ca.us.clients.pavlovmedia.net. [68.180.127.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2ba6d1c61c3sm2010819eec.19.2026.02.08.19.36.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 Feb 2026 19:36:12 -0800 (PST) From: Ethan Nelson-Moore To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ethan Nelson-Moore , Michael Grzeschik , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: arcnet: fix typos in comments Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2026 19:36:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20260209033604.60033-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The ARCnet code contains quite a few typos in comments. Fix them. Initially noticed by inspection, then augmented using codespell. Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore --- drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c | 2 +- drivers/net/arcnet/arcdevice.h | 10 +++++----- drivers/net/arcnet/rfc1201.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c b/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c index 53d10a04d1bd..fb3d3565aa9a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c +++ b/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int __init arcrimi_found(struct net_device *dev) lp->hw.copy_to_card = arcrimi_copy_to_card; lp->hw.copy_from_card = arcrimi_copy_from_card; - /* re-reserve the memory region - arcrimi_probe() alloced this reqion + /* re-reserve the memory region - arcrimi_probe() allocated this reqion * but didn't know the real size. Free that region and then re-get * with the correct size. There is a VERY slim chance this could * fail. diff --git a/drivers/net/arcnet/arcdevice.h b/drivers/net/arcnet/arcdevice.h index 6a5af0943567..1950df5dbbe6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/arcnet/arcdevice.h +++ b/drivers/net/arcnet/arcdevice.h @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ do { \ #define TXACKflag 0x02 /* transmitted msg. ackd */ #define RECONflag 0x04 /* network reconfigured */ #define TESTflag 0x08 /* test flag */ -#define EXCNAKflag 0x08 /* excesive nak flag */ +#define EXCNAKflag 0x08 /* excessive nak flag */ #define RESETflag 0x10 /* power-on-reset */ #define RES1flag 0x20 /* reserved - usually set by jumper */ #define RES2flag 0x40 /* reserved - usually set by jumper */ @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ do { \ #define RESETclear 0x08 /* power-on-reset */ #define CONFIGclear 0x10 /* system reconfigured */ -#define EXCNAKclear 0x0E /* Clear and acknowledge the excive nak bit */ +#define EXCNAKclear 0x0E /* Clear and acknowledge the excessive nak bit */ /* flags for "load test flags" command */ #define TESTload 0x08 /* test flag (diagnostic) */ @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ do { \ struct ArcProto { char suffix; /* a for RFC1201, e for ether-encap, etc. */ int mtu; /* largest possible packet */ - int is_ip; /* This is a ip plugin - not a raw thing */ + int is_ip; /* This is an ip plugin - not a raw thing */ void (*rx)(struct net_device *dev, int bufnum, struct archdr *pkthdr, int length); @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct arcnet_local { char *card_name; /* card ident string */ int card_flags; /* special card features */ - /* On preemtive and SMB a lock is needed */ + /* On preemptive and SMP a lock is needed */ spinlock_t lock; struct led_trigger *tx_led_trig; @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ struct arcnet_local { int num_recons; /* number of RECONs between first and last. */ int network_down; /* do we think the network is down? */ - int excnak_pending; /* We just got an excesive nak interrupt */ + int excnak_pending; /* We just got an excessive nak interrupt */ /* RESET flag handling */ int reset_in_progress; diff --git a/drivers/net/arcnet/rfc1201.c b/drivers/net/arcnet/rfc1201.c index 0edf35d971c5..f2ec58d06fc3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/arcnet/rfc1201.c +++ b/drivers/net/arcnet/rfc1201.c @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void rx(struct net_device *dev, int bufnum, skb->protocol = type_trans(skb, dev); netif_rx(skb); } else { /* split packet */ - /* NOTE: MSDOS ARP packet correction should only need to + /* NOTE: MS-DOS ARP packet correction should only need to * apply to unsplit packets, since ARP packets are so short. * * My interpretation of the RFC1201 document is that if a -- 2.43.0