From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, willemb@google.com, petrm@nvidia.com,
donald.hunter@gmail.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] selftests: drv-net: gro: use SO_TXTIME to schedule packets together
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:56:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260210175638.123782b2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.743811e01cc@gmail.com>
On Sun, 08 Feb 2026 21:39:38 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Longer packet sequence tests are quite flaky when the test is run
> > over a real network. Try to avoid at least the jitter on the sender
> > side by scheduling all the packets to be sent at once using SO_TXTIME.
> > Use hardcoded tx time of 5msec in the future. In my test increasing
> > this time past 2msec makes no difference so 5msec is plenty of margin.
> > Since we now expect more output buffering make sure to raise SNDBUF.
> >
> > Experimenting with long sequences I see frequent failures when sending
> > 200 packets, only 50-100 packets get coalesced. With this change
> > up to 1000 packets get coalesced relatively reliably.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>
> Does this require having FQ installed? I don't see any qdisc config
> in the GRO test.
It's a bit of an opportunistic optimization.
I initially intended it for for the "long sequence of packets"
test. But I failed to get AF_PACKET+FQ to cooperate sufficiently
to queue all of the packets in the same bucket. Otherwise FQ "sorts"
the packets, and breaks what the test is trying to do :(
Oh, and as mentioned in the commit msg - this improvement is intended
for HW-GRO, which may have very low timeouts. The test already
configures timeout for SW GRO to a very high value, so don't think
we would gain anything from setting up FQ on veth/netdevsim for the
SW test.
So IDK what to do with this patch. Maybe I should just drop it?
It _seemed_ useful, but I don't have enough datapoints to do a real
comparison of how much it improves reliability.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-07 0:35 [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net: stats, tools, driver tests for HW GRO Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] eth: bnxt: gather and report HW-GRO stats Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-08 0:09 ` Michael Chan
2026-02-11 1:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] tools: ynltool: factor out qstat dumping Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] tools: ynltool: add qstats analysis for HW-GRO efficiency / savings Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-09 9:43 ` Petr Machata
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] selftests: net: move gro to lib for HW vs SW reuse Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-09 2:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] selftests: drv-net: give HW stats sync time extra 25% of margin Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-09 2:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] selftests: drv-net: gro: use SO_TXTIME to schedule packets together Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-09 2:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-11 1:56 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-11 3:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-11 3:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-11 4:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-11 17:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-11 17:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] selftests: drv-net: gro: test GRO stats Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] selftests: drv-net: gro: add test for packet ordering Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07 0:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] selftests: drv-net: gro: add a test for GRO depth Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260210175638.123782b2@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox