From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, adding tests
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:42:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260211094218.GA504514@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYud8nWZ7c0RxRIx@sellars>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:58PM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> [...]
> > > +test_inactive_other_querier_norespdelay()
> > > +{
> > > + RET=0
> > > +
> > > + test_active_setup_bridge "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
> > > + test_active_setup_config "1" "2" "3" ""
> > > + #test_active_setup_wait
> >
> > Why the comment? There are more instances below
>
> The intention was just to highlight what was skipped in comparison
> to the according test_{vlan,}_active_*_querier() variants.
>
> Do you think I should remove these lines? Or add a brief
> clarification, something like "# skipped: test_active_setup_wait"?
OK, I see. A brief clarification would be good. I initially thought that
these are leftovers that you forgot to remove before submitting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 2:52 [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] net: bridge: reduce multicast checks in fast path Linus Lüssing
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/14] net: bridge: mcast: export ip{4,6}_active state to netlink Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:00 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, adding tests Linus Lüssing
2026-02-07 4:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-08 16:00 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-10 21:06 ` Linus Lüssing
2026-02-11 9:42 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] net: bridge: mcast: avoid sleeping on bridge-down Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 11:41 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-08 16:01 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, IGMP/MLD querier appearance Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:07 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, foreign IGMP/MLD querier disappearance Linus Lüssing
2026-02-07 4:56 ` [net-next,v2,05/14] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-11 3:05 ` Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/14] " Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, IPv6 address availability Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:08 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, own MLD querier disappearance Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:09 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, if snooping is enabled Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:09 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, VLAN snooping Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, bridge up/down Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, prepare for outside lock reads Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] net: bridge: mcast: use combined active state in netlink Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/14] net: bridge: mcast: use combined active state in fast/data path Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:12 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-02-06 2:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/14] net: bridge: mcast: add inactive state assertions Linus Lüssing
2026-02-08 16:13 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260211094218.GA504514@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shaw.leon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox