From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885D935028E for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770803884; cv=none; b=JG5eonb42CHcDlORWM3Pk9Fo7Wk2I364+N1r9I8uk47M1Wx3gA9brDSjHtzcOmgW8OWyq4OJw+uiN4ICD0M9voBbhdUPNAxifvd8Pa7wZ48ce/jkVY5+rH4bIbJ4YBYlyMEuWW3h7ZXaczf+3acafAr8yP08ok01ZqLqK9wmszQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770803884; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j1gGwzFrPEp55EzVIdvTaxzf5VDVeMo4Ihv3OYZ5rOU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GG9/y5rX98jQWsJJmOTCpjqFje11baeqdl537RCBc5/Q/rgn1R38d9ge7+dPytmPsjzXm+uDVOd43Icf17cSe4C4dAlLWPRtbeaL/FLsCNlikcUrxiTqbaUt5TaEND25RNkmAkz1L3pqZyIU8epdzVYWVkSuDB/nd824EZRnxNc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=iGyPRlJc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="iGyPRlJc" Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47ee57c478eso5881125e9.1 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 01:58:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1770803882; x=1771408682; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uLronaqmOYx9+5+0YsCI13INff1FSvhU4CEpmAvdKu4=; b=iGyPRlJc25xse5U+nEAT7D7xFYzl6ZRhWXF69+2p6Knvr4EeRFZYXWT/ratiAb+6nu emjdMVkjjEBHLNEUHdJXbdwHBYOEbr73U9N4ZIJiiTHBl6l/grN1h9Ytk+/3blLwc3nO iRpqyQ9CPiGKdQauEgV9+ZEOcKfLQcsU2gEPpMyhiqulymOs7UDqgX4/AeYBBUZkxAhO g9ZFUAaPO8OZOHEu/xTxCL7zdXb0x/csAXd8xweCvlmbOjBkwYthpV4Wd4EqUWGwlCGb b5EdC2w38enNCgQFneW7dC1ziNfm3s7OhhIwmiqFKM9+sYU8qOLRXtMrOpMpGOjjia9X Eolg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1770803882; x=1771408682; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uLronaqmOYx9+5+0YsCI13INff1FSvhU4CEpmAvdKu4=; b=j7n1A0nLby09iHTMdqzPJID+2TXk1aRdY+2O2rdrYmwhOnkYN8G0OywiN6xGD2Jrd5 AuuJs8D9lD2tX5oukeQCkQe56QkNr+27DvOgdobQYCx2BvAzOrpp9obDYwzZLQaFHO91 8sQP295PjtNPInjyRR6E1T2Kdgyuml2g7DJBzuC+u39uyd2rBhk8hFAzGuIXxJlSzHZ9 VXnlonTRWtZJVXZaO9aKr4jhvRpQ/SainSGj0azvGVmPVwSv00MRg8WD0Cnhe16eNtCq FvYn6HiRFPJ4TCwNb90S31gZgC5UDc2ktQ5EyuiS4TCOmTwXXBjjFuGsDxaPFh1rswmf mjjw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUj3c7lQiBfKuQ6MND/RXeaAmit2D8qiUGmq7PkdNi5ok/JwQfKxmQeqMPAkwvQViqoqyln+LI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyx3dxPqKTNpqKSpUJkYI01mva3MyTB4EJhVse5E8U6gYtyCD/v BbWjYXQPJFMxp2vqFF567K7X8OhKejxHVaogGW8oUIiR8Yabd37BCfsj X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aJHPYQCNeWJtccRgIQTX8ZywhoqX3JDSsLTpaGmbEopBrkporeu7K+rsmudxb/ CEtJ9yPbe1krNaZbsuGCx23IJa9cWzYBEF60NOzJ3Y5ISahyWZ9dL950AR/5vTdldnSi2Fz2zvm fnHncneh3Kz7d8MarXhPxF1FHIwMMokhhy7v+he/cr/Zf3W/Qphxe3p1PzcSjvR6Hd55JnjF5pZ 8WrOC4bSQ/1O3gleTLUPyz+wnyVAnCiMO11wCuOCiVZpKktZ/NmnLS5JbXbnAXpMyfrQi6LxhiX vRgCLwxeyTOupDtUWwNIMB8qjTN9oDzrZ0d4vulRPgBwZz2IRDibiCM7Ge5FqZFDGI3W1Urttxz 7RLp+KJs9/eprro2sHwYNADiGtHyM+rCLFGF/Cp4Jkg9RMt6aVgJSFdeQ6P3HTBIkIgtJL3yHSw 9gJcHSeqqYksxC1ho= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a02:b0:477:7bd8:8f2d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4835e321172mr11637965e9.8.1770803881559; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 01:58:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([2a02:2f04:d501:d900:d8ac:c964:9b43:1b13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43783e5c550sm3671505f8f.36.2026.02.11.01.57.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Feb 2026 01:57:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:57:56 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Paolo Abeni Cc: Daniel Golle , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Wunderlich , Chad Monroe , Cezary Wilmanski , Liang Xu , John Crispin Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 0/4] net: dsa: initial support for MaxLinear MxL862xx switches Message-ID: <20260211095756.cejtseyheagu4pku@skbuf> References: <20260207214733.m2zvh6ozo7vsc5hj@skbuf> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:49:56AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 2/7/26 10:47 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2026 at 03:06:48AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote: > >> This series adds very basic DSA support for the MaxLinear MxL86252 > >> (5x 2500Base-T PHYs) and MxL86282 (8x 2500Base-T PHYs) switches. > >> In addition to the 2.5G TP ports both switches also come with two > >> SerDes interfaces which can be used either to connect external PHYs > >> or SFP cages, or as CPU port when using the switch with this DSA driver. > > > > For the entire set: > > > > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean > > > > with some minor comments I'll leave in individual patches, which I'd > > like you to address. > > > > I don't want to put anybody in a bad spot, but given what time it is, > > this set should get at least _some_ time in net-next before the upcoming > > net-next PR, to allow for some reaction time in case of some unexpected > > reports like from static analysis or similar. > > As I'm wrapping-up the PR right now, and the series is not applied yet, > I fear the above is not going to happen. > > Since a driver is involved (as opposed to the core stack) and there will > be the usual release cycle to address issues before the code lands in an > official release, I tend to think this series should still be merged - > unless someone voices strong and valid concerns _very soon_. > > Thanks, > > Paolo My feedback is non-functional, so it likely won't be addressed in the RCs. Anyway, it's probably fine...