* [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
@ 2026-02-13 2:44 Feng Yang
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Feng Yang
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Feng Yang @ 2026-02-13 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, posk, ast, daniel, andrii,
martin.lau, eddyz87
Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, yangfeng59949
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
Changes in v6:
- Modify the bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap function and add selftests for it.
Thanks, Martin KaFai Lau.
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260210090657.86977-1-yangfeng59949@163.com/
Changes in v5:
- Refer to the bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute function to configure the dst parameter.
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260209015111.28144-1-yangfeng59949@163.com/
Changes in v4:
- add rcu lock
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260206055113.63476-1-yangfeng59949@163.com/
Changes in v3:
- use dst_init
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260205092227.126665-1-yangfeng59949@163.com/
Changes in v2:
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260127084520.13890-1-luyun_611@163.com/
Feng Yang (2):
bpf: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of
bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 7 +++++--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
2026-02-13 2:44 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
@ 2026-02-13 2:44 ` Feng Yang
2026-02-23 21:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Feng Yang @ 2026-02-13 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, posk, ast, daniel, andrii,
martin.lau, eddyz87
Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, yangfeng59949
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
The bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap helper needs to access skb_dst(skb)->dev to
calculate the needed headroom:
err = skb_cow_head(skb,
len + LL_RESERVED_SPACE(skb_dst(skb)->dev));
But skb->_skb_refdst may not be initialized when the skb is set up by
bpf_prog_test_run_skb function. Executing bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap function
in this scenario will trigger null pointer dereference, causing a kernel
crash as Yinhao reported:
[ 105.186365] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
[ 105.186382] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 105.186388] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 105.186393] PGD 121d3d067 P4D 121d3d067 PUD 106c83067 PMD 0
[ 105.186404] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 105.186412] CPU: 3 PID: 3250 Comm: poc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc5 #1
[ 105.186423] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[ 105.186427] RIP: 0010:bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap+0x1eb/0x520
[ 105.186443] Code: 0f 84 de 01 00 00 0f b7 4a 04 66 85 c9 0f 85 47 01 00 00 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 cc cc cc cc 48 8b 73 58 48 83 e6 fe <48> 8b 36 0f b7 be ec 00 00 00 0f b7 b6 e6 00 00 00 01 fe 83 e6 f0
[ 105.186449] RSP: 0018:ffffbb0e0387bc50 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 105.186455] RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffff94c74e036500 RCX: ffff94c74874da00
[ 105.186460] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff94c74e036500
[ 105.186463] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 105.186467] R10: ffffbb0e0387bd50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffbb0e0387bc98
[ 105.186471] R13: 0000000000000014 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
[ 105.186484] FS: 00007f166aa4d680(0000) GS:ffff94c8b7780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 105.186490] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 105.186494] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000015eade001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
[ 105.186499] PKRU: 55555554
[ 105.186502] Call Trace:
[ 105.186507] <TASK>
[ 105.186513] bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap+0x2b/0x40
[ 105.186522] bpf_prog_a75eaad51e517912+0x41/0x49
[ 105.186536] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x18/0x30
[ 105.186547] ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xa0
[ 105.186554] bpf_test_run+0x195/0x320
[ 105.186563] ? bpf_test_run+0x10f/0x320
[ 105.186579] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x2f5/0x4f0
[ 105.186590] __sys_bpf+0x69c/0xa40
[ 105.186603] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1e/0x30
[ 105.186611] do_syscall_64+0x59/0x110
[ 105.186620] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0xe0
[ 105.186649] RIP: 0033:0x7f166a97455d
Check the skb->_skb_refdst in bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap function, and return
-EINVAL if _skb_refdst is NULL.
Fixes: 52f278774e79 ("bpf: implement BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP mode in bpf_lwt_push_encap")
Reported-by: Yinhao Hu <dddddd@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <M202472210@hust.edu.cn>
Closes: https://groups.google.com/g/hust-os-kernel-patches/c/8-a0kPpBW2s
Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
index 9f40be0c3e71..374054e1a2c6 100644
--- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
@@ -616,11 +616,14 @@ int bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len, bool ingress)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (ingress)
+ if (ingress) {
err = skb_cow_head(skb, len + skb->mac_len);
- else
+ } else {
+ if (unlikely(!skb_dst(skb)))
+ return -EINVAL;
err = skb_cow_head(skb,
len + LL_RESERVED_SPACE(skb_dst(skb)->dev));
+ }
if (unlikely(err))
return err;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
2026-02-13 2:44 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Feng Yang
@ 2026-02-13 2:44 ` Feng Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Feng Yang @ 2026-02-13 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, posk, ast, daniel, andrii,
martin.lau, eddyz87
Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, yangfeng59949
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
Calling bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap will not cause a crash when dst is missing.
Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
index 5ab746307309..9cef07e6eceb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
@@ -231,4 +231,24 @@ __naked void not_permitted_for_lwt_prog(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("missing dst when calling bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void missing_dst_call_bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r9 = 69; \
+ r3 = r10; \
+ r3 += -32; \
+ *(u64 *)(r3 + 0) = r9; \
+ r2 = 2; \
+ r4 = 20; \
+ call %[bpf_lwt_push_encap]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_lwt_push_encap)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Feng Yang
@ 2026-02-23 21:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-25 12:12 ` Feng Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2026-02-23 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Yang
Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms, posk, ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87
On 2/12/26 6:44 PM, Feng Yang wrote:
> From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
>
> The bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap helper needs to access skb_dst(skb)->dev to
> calculate the needed headroom:
>
> err = skb_cow_head(skb,
> len + LL_RESERVED_SPACE(skb_dst(skb)->dev));
>
> But skb->_skb_refdst may not be initialized when the skb is set up by
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb function. Executing bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap function
> in this scenario will trigger null pointer dereference, causing a kernel
> crash as Yinhao reported:
>
> [ 105.186365] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> [ 105.186382] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 105.186388] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 105.186393] PGD 121d3d067 P4D 121d3d067 PUD 106c83067 PMD 0
> [ 105.186404] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [ 105.186412] CPU: 3 PID: 3250 Comm: poc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc5 #1
> [ 105.186423] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> [ 105.186427] RIP: 0010:bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap+0x1eb/0x520
> [ 105.186443] Code: 0f 84 de 01 00 00 0f b7 4a 04 66 85 c9 0f 85 47 01 00 00 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 cc cc cc cc 48 8b 73 58 48 83 e6 fe <48> 8b 36 0f b7 be ec 00 00 00 0f b7 b6 e6 00 00 00 01 fe 83 e6 f0
> [ 105.186449] RSP: 0018:ffffbb0e0387bc50 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 105.186455] RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffff94c74e036500 RCX: ffff94c74874da00
> [ 105.186460] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff94c74e036500
> [ 105.186463] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 105.186467] R10: ffffbb0e0387bd50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffbb0e0387bc98
> [ 105.186471] R13: 0000000000000014 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
> [ 105.186484] FS: 00007f166aa4d680(0000) GS:ffff94c8b7780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 105.186490] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 105.186494] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000015eade001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
> [ 105.186499] PKRU: 55555554
> [ 105.186502] Call Trace:
> [ 105.186507] <TASK>
> [ 105.186513] bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap+0x2b/0x40
> [ 105.186522] bpf_prog_a75eaad51e517912+0x41/0x49
> [ 105.186536] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x18/0x30
> [ 105.186547] ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xa0
> [ 105.186554] bpf_test_run+0x195/0x320
> [ 105.186563] ? bpf_test_run+0x10f/0x320
> [ 105.186579] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x2f5/0x4f0
> [ 105.186590] __sys_bpf+0x69c/0xa40
> [ 105.186603] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1e/0x30
> [ 105.186611] do_syscall_64+0x59/0x110
> [ 105.186620] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0xe0
> [ 105.186649] RIP: 0033:0x7f166a97455d
>
> Check the skb->_skb_refdst in bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap function, and return
> -EINVAL if _skb_refdst is NULL.
>
> Fixes: 52f278774e79 ("bpf: implement BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP mode in bpf_lwt_push_encap")
> Reported-by: Yinhao Hu <dddddd@hust.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <M202472210@hust.edu.cn>
> Closes: https://groups.google.com/g/hust-os-kernel-patches/c/8-a0kPpBW2s
> Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
> net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> index 9f40be0c3e71..374054e1a2c6 100644
> --- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> @@ -616,11 +616,14 @@ int bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len, bool ingress)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (ingress)
> + if (ingress) {
> err = skb_cow_head(skb, len + skb->mac_len);
> - else
> + } else {
> + if (unlikely(!skb_dst(skb)))
Please check if the v5 discussion make sense (fix in test_run.c). It
should be something simpler than v5, e.g. always assign a dst to skb for
is_lwt case. I think always using net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry should work
but it needs to check ipv6 mod is loaded/enabled before using. Checking
'ipv6_bpf_stub' should do. I don't think we need to complicate things
for v4 only kernel in test_run. I don't think testing skb->protocol
matters also from looking at bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap but please check.
pw-bot: cr
> + return -EINVAL;
> err = skb_cow_head(skb,
> len + LL_RESERVED_SPACE(skb_dst(skb)->dev));
> + }
> if (unlikely(err))
> return err;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
2026-02-23 21:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
@ 2026-02-25 12:12 ` Feng Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Feng Yang @ 2026-02-25 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: martin.lau
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, davem, eddyz87, edumazet, horms, kuba,
linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, netdev, pabeni, posk,
yangfeng59949
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:39:51 -0800, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
...
> Please check if the v5 discussion make sense (fix in test_run.c). It
> should be something simpler than v5, e.g. always assign a dst to skb for
> is_lwt case. I think always using net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry should work
> but it needs to check ipv6 mod is loaded/enabled before using. Checking
> 'ipv6_bpf_stub' should do. I don't think we need to complicate things
> for v4 only kernel in test_run. I don't think testing skb->protocol
> matters also from looking at bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap but please check.
Sure, I'll check, modify, and test it. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-25 13:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-13 2:44 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Feng Yang
2026-02-23 21:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-25 12:12 ` Feng Yang
2026-02-13 2:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox