From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36BD936BCE8; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771336506; cv=none; b=jNILKzkkUY4fA//tn++Z8tH8HIM3lKmg6lYlHZBxDspRajTiV0HujgRLHvGMAYTkMua6x8Ghi7Ga34enN1d/wwxtDBWpcbrTje9cSqPtsq2/whWWHMa8Di2nRyrZUX6HXTboaoi5o/b1KNhb6qV0gd6POW5GtiLh9pZVQyZV6pA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771336506; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ge7gIG8IIRQWGUGHw6qwZgqeXDldxXzM/a5Ov/Y7Rr4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cGhuNfQZbeiYuHYnKrzV5yyzYXZska36IRkHIIFMarKUSPwvF4ktDPCdTs9dtDDqh4z8Y5TOPXEJkDr4Fg8NGOIidrudPeawrVyCSe5FuZvWIHyHv38WWixGPrQMYJsqSZjrcW2qsqTOpL19vWF7AO+ZSiYfM9QojN0D3G15pRA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GCGtgM/F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GCGtgM/F" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771336506; x=1802872506; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ge7gIG8IIRQWGUGHw6qwZgqeXDldxXzM/a5Ov/Y7Rr4=; b=GCGtgM/FmyQ3VvGHeRqti8T5m744PEpJGb2MUlVu/QL3FMlK4IFgconr tOhwXJWIM60K9xG6tlCrltLMdLghfVUFO8xBjyg25cHoPt2knEeH5RMvI ILLFfMfvNR1+l1p/dx4rqLox/bM1tXbsv0ETE+T74FnAvfnsVUt5IewGq CCeyBshvSuf0DT4whbuCbi69VHEOE81draCDN8AyTHvTdWSib8/hlaFzM ofE2orlCUkpkPb3nfeo7qt/qkCmya+RvwNeZU9orpWrtN9UnsfOxzswFZ ce1kBZCfr9g1zG7Q1Cssb3TB0jhkGtCY1c8NYMV9NpUxNMeTj5h8reuPr A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WYXU1u4DS02LdJLqL9qTyA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Sx9IsUw7S3egCMjg8qtzoQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11703"; a="72470556" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,296,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="72470556" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2026 05:55:05 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: McvEJOwdRVyWWokjnxn1vA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GnTaJH0OS/WfbqRKhldZQg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,296,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="213904726" Received: from irvmail002.ir.intel.com ([10.43.11.120]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2026 05:54:56 -0800 Received: from lincoln.igk.intel.com (lincoln.igk.intel.com [10.102.21.235]) by irvmail002.ir.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F5128795; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:54:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Larysa Zaremba To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Larysa Zaremba , Claudiu Manoil , Vladimir Oltean , Wei Fang , Clark Wang , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Alexander Lobakin , Maciej Fijalkowski , "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" , Tushar Vyavahare , Jason Xing , =?UTF-8?q?Ricardo=20B=2E=20Marli=C3=A8re?= , Eelco Chaudron , Lorenzo Bianconi , Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen , imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov , Dragos Tatulea , Martin KaFai Lau Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 9/9] xdp: produce a warning when calculated tailroom is negative Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:24:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20260217132450.1936200-10-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20260217132450.1936200-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> References: <20260217132450.1936200-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Many ethernet drivers report xdp Rx queue frag size as being the same as DMA write size. However, the only user of this field, namely bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(), clearly expects a truesize. Such difference leads to unspecific memory corruption issues under certain circumstances, e.g. in ixgbevf maximum DMA write size is 3 KB, so when running xskxceiver's XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW_MULTI_BUFF, 6K packet fully uses all DMA-writable space in 2 buffers. This would be fine, if only rxq->frag_size was properly set to 4K, but value of 3K results in a negative tailroom, because there is a non-zero page offset. We are supposed to return -EINVAL and be done with it in such case, but due to tailroom being stored as an unsigned int, it is reported to be somewhere near UINT_MAX, resulting in a tail being grown, even if the requested offset is too much (it is around 2K in the abovementioned test). This later leads to all kinds of unspecific calltraces. [ 7340.337579] xskxceiver[1440]: segfault at 1da718 ip 00007f4161aeac9d sp 00007f41615a6a00 error 6 [ 7340.338040] xskxceiver[1441]: segfault at 7f410000000b ip 00000000004042b5 sp 00007f415bffecf0 error 4 [ 7340.338179] in libc.so.6[61c9d,7f4161aaf000+160000] [ 7340.339230] in xskxceiver[42b5,400000+69000] [ 7340.340300] likely on CPU 6 (core 0, socket 6) [ 7340.340302] Code: ff ff 01 e9 f4 fe ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 4c 39 f0 74 73 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 f0 0f b1 17 0f 85 ba 00 00 00 49 8b 87 88 00 00 00 <4c> 89 70 08 eb cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8d bd f0 fe ff ff 89 85 ec fe [ 7340.340888] likely on CPU 3 (core 0, socket 3) [ 7340.345088] Code: 00 00 00 ba 00 00 00 00 be 00 00 00 00 89 c7 e8 31 ca ff ff 89 45 ec 8b 45 ec 85 c0 78 07 b8 00 00 00 00 eb 46 e8 0b c8 ff ff <8b> 00 83 f8 69 74 24 e8 ff c7 ff ff 8b 00 83 f8 0b 74 18 e8 f3 c7 [ 7340.404334] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6d255010bdffc: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 7340.405972] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1439 Comm: xskxceiver Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1+ #21 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 7340.408006] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.17.0-5.fc42 04/01/2014 [ 7340.409716] RIP: 0010:lookup_swap_cgroup_id+0x44/0x80 [ 7340.410455] Code: 83 f8 1c 73 39 48 ba ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 03 48 8b 04 c5 20 55 fa bd 48 21 d1 48 89 ca 83 e1 01 48 d1 ea c1 e1 04 48 8d 04 90 <8b> 00 48 83 c4 10 d3 e8 c3 cc cc cc cc 31 c0 e9 98 b7 dd 00 48 89 [ 7340.412787] RSP: 0018:ffffcc5c04f7f6d0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 7340.413494] RAX: 0006d255010bdffc RBX: ffff891f477895a8 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 7340.414431] RDX: 0001c17e3fffffff RSI: 00fa070000000000 RDI: 000382fc7fffffff [ 7340.415354] RBP: 00fa070000000000 R08: ffffcc5c04f7f8f8 R09: ffffcc5c04f7f7d0 [ 7340.416283] R10: ffff891f4c1a7000 R11: ffffcc5c04f7f9c8 R12: ffffcc5c04f7f7d0 [ 7340.417218] R13: 03ffffffffffffff R14: 00fa06fffffffe00 R15: ffff891f47789500 [ 7340.418229] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff891ffdfaa000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7340.419489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7340.420286] CR2: 00007f415bfffd58 CR3: 0000000103f03002 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 [ 7340.421237] PKRU: 55555554 [ 7340.421623] Call Trace: [ 7340.421987] [ 7340.422309] ? softleaf_from_pte+0x77/0xa0 [ 7340.422855] swap_pte_batch+0xa7/0x290 [ 7340.423363] zap_nonpresent_ptes.constprop.0.isra.0+0xd1/0x270 [ 7340.424102] zap_pte_range+0x281/0x580 [ 7340.424607] zap_pmd_range.isra.0+0xc9/0x240 [ 7340.425177] unmap_page_range+0x24d/0x420 [ 7340.425714] unmap_vmas+0xa1/0x180 [ 7340.426185] exit_mmap+0xe1/0x3b0 [ 7340.426644] __mmput+0x41/0x150 [ 7340.427098] exit_mm+0xb1/0x110 [ 7340.427539] do_exit+0x1b2/0x460 [ 7340.427992] do_group_exit+0x2d/0xc0 [ 7340.428477] get_signal+0x79d/0x7e0 [ 7340.428957] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x34/0x100 [ 7340.429571] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8e/0x4c0 [ 7340.430159] do_syscall_64+0x188/0x6b0 [ 7340.430672] ? __do_sys_clone3+0xd9/0x120 [ 7340.431212] ? switch_fpu_return+0x4e/0xd0 [ 7340.431761] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.isra.0+0xa1/0xc0 [ 7340.432498] ? do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x6b0 [ 7340.433015] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x445/0x690 [ 7340.433582] ? count_memcg_events+0xd6/0x210 [ 7340.434151] ? handle_mm_fault+0x212/0x340 [ 7340.434697] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2b4/0x7b0 [ 7340.435271] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.435788] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.436299] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.436812] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.437323] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 7340.437973] RIP: 0033:0x7f4161b14169 [ 7340.438468] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f4161b1413f. [ 7340.439242] RSP: 002b:00007ffc6ebfa770 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [ 7340.440173] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000000005a1 RCX: 00007f4161b14169 [ 7340.441061] RDX: 00000000000005a1 RSI: 0000000000000109 RDI: 00007f415bfff990 [ 7340.441943] RBP: 00007ffc6ebfa7a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff [ 7340.442824] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 7340.443707] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f415bfff990 R15: 00007f415bfff6c0 [ 7340.444586] [ 7340.444922] Modules linked in: rfkill intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit libnvdimm kvm_intel vfat fat kvm snd_pcm irqbypass rapl iTCO_wdt snd_timer intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support snd ixgbevf virtio_net soundcore i2c_i801 pcspkr libeth_xdp net_failover i2c_smbus lpc_ich failover libeth virtio_balloon joydev 9p fuse loop zram lz4hc_compress lz4_compress 9pnet_virtio 9pnet netfs ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw qemu_fw_cfg [ 7340.449650] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The issue can be fixed in all in-tree drivers, but we cannot just trust OOT drivers to not do this. Therefore, make tailroom a signed int and produce a warning when it is negative to prevent such mistakes in the future. Fixes: bf25146a5595 ("bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API") Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba --- net/core/filter.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 5f5489665c58..e93d9dc0471a 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -4151,13 +4151,14 @@ static int bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset) struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp); skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags - 1]; struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq = xdp->rxq; - unsigned int tailroom; + int tailroom; if (!rxq->frag_size || rxq->frag_size > xdp->frame_sz) return -EOPNOTSUPP; tailroom = rxq->frag_size - skb_frag_size(frag) - skb_frag_off(frag) % rxq->frag_size; + WARN_ON_ONCE(tailroom < 0); if (unlikely(offset > tailroom)) return -EINVAL; -- 2.52.0