From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7831F4611; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771461681; cv=none; b=dDX6dZYwKmanJIWRk/yLa6M4tBMXBMo2EMXpZDYQCPIxddYsjQ10KUjaS4N21eyLJw0F4eJLB001vdqkHxkSWe31J2mlTDhqrtCZzB98yU3zXR8OOp5pdsERZno65Ph49/XzeiwEE79vsd5htune5SPXeHBMd5QjBIskSJDm9rg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771461681; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1VGZTiHH6lz93ptvC5y3a1UDrS1AgfaABSsTg9z2EJ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m91icz0dBDgIZyLPoTOMt0cNrXNXRfzh4XaKbYBm1teQTcSdAqJsg/oiNyscgGfJr07Q82j3loh0vZz9oWoulSDlPySKvrLQf7IKcJsbcy0pF0tJBrHXLt4dqN1SgpYdtQPWyHqCCNpO2yPoVIINBHPOdbyGUO6dwtQeSY0vegA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OKypQ9FC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OKypQ9FC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37721C116D0; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:41:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771461681; bh=1VGZTiHH6lz93ptvC5y3a1UDrS1AgfaABSsTg9z2EJ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OKypQ9FCe5NJdl0PkK/RF5NUIDU2I7XtINI3jrfj6r/81bv0xVOSR3fpDe4QUfZ39 N6W9pq3qrPMxKaAs37uZGv0iwBNO2rarziJrLjITdH/VRLGpGdAJWK19WR2aoBq8qi AM14IBSge7mnd/uM4fNFNNTGLUAUk79RW/Uo80iHonCPTg3c0/tI5+oS35Yee4VEXa AtBS0Qa2HBPV4KswbcanaRJdiHu4WDezt9IWyKunHWTCODGGBpUB8dBW7Vi+jn2Rk4 GPxZjRToew1aavNrU9x/cxqCndtV7gkVZ2ULYWYv4jIB6sogQ9dO9S7w99dp1RmUSW X4V6x/ez6K96A== Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:41:19 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Bobby Eshleman Cc: Stefano Garzarella , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Stefan Hajnoczi , Shuah Khan , Bobby Eshleman , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Daan De Meyer Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock: lock down child_ns_mode as write-once Message-ID: <20260218164119.72368d53@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260217-vsock-ns-write-once-v1-1-a1fb30f289a9@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:15:38 -0800 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > I'm not sure what the policy is in netdev, but I would prefer to have > > > selftest changes in another patch (I think earlier in the series so as > > > not to break the bisection), in order to simplify backporting (e.g. in > > > CentOS Stream, to keep the backport small, I didn't backport the dozens > > > of patches for selftest that we did previously). > > Sounds good! I wasn't sure if breakage so tightly coupled should be in > the same patch or not, I'm happy to split it up to ease backporting. FWIW the netdev recommendation is indeed to split the selftests out. Also to bungle selftest patches with the fix into one series targeting net, even tho the selftests patches won't have a Fixes tag.