From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA231EEA49; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771468875; cv=none; b=LAQMmnYSxree1629MGnnJZSSRXzAfK4ilrw/XkK3VC0xLOHWT+0jHqkNYqhuw+jKq893yoRgKQeHiamqCso/IzKzSDZKF0UaTrnOS1zx634H4GJfn2t4MK9BlVgL7CJ2TPRk8sRzJx+qw8pQzm689lDtPr4/kuMSMgClcZiYFks= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771468875; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4qa8PM3QPfyLTwp+FHLkYksJ0nocHdKpD92Kq/ehAd8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QaSV+Z49QioGMu5IS44+8kS5RNEm/jN3AYJ1vI1sNDAIPSSD+Ly7ektlFTELDxWutcz5qOW/3xUJM8zQ3HC3648oPwZSR2NvDoOCvaMZOpqXYcSxaSQyuDrmBaw7NY+WaWjx4VAj7AHAVr3SpRdKA7NkF+kWYdiWhuY4fvO6miU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fCqf0FfQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fCqf0FfQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00494C116D0; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 02:41:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771468875; bh=4qa8PM3QPfyLTwp+FHLkYksJ0nocHdKpD92Kq/ehAd8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fCqf0FfQ44kpqiSjDNNB6gl47x+N/OUeGKrD04ZXONxYYyu7JzxYdTcROOKJev87P Ne2Dz7uKcYJJBerTnnIaZ0Yx/MBVcDG3I1snIDtPPRrNNjiqZuyNIisPq6FUNIl8xa SVyoNznmYH/8VdyrTl+bnWeZZYdeDeyR5DP2hD9AiMudR4QFcFauJzzuZMIdJx1w40 UcIAavoN56fix+v8Cprtm9vBAYPVOYthjB1vaoU5tVcFBRStAsmYgTAVtbTzpNgOhJ yQKvbKV/OICQMI1DukGMMqf+ZRaw13qJlAaYOGMr7FzzC4EXWWQKaSZggZQt1LGPuK 2bmBZSc7opVaA== Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:41:14 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Westphal Cc: , Paolo Abeni , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , , pablo@netfilter.org Subject: [TEST] nft_queue / test_udp_gro_ct flakes Message-ID: <20260218184114.0b405b72@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260206153048.17570-4-fw@strlen.de> References: <20260206153048.17570-1-fw@strlen.de> <20260206153048.17570-4-fw@strlen.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:30:40 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > Without the preceding patch, this fails with: > > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected udp conntrack entry > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected software segmentation to occur, had 10 and 0 Hi Florian! This test case is a bit flaky for us on debug kernels: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pass=0&test=nft-queue-sh It's 3rd flakiest of all netdev selftests at this point. Example: # 2026/02/12 10:14:22 socat[20338] W exiting on signal 15 # 2026/02/12 10:14:22 socat[20383] W exiting on signal 15 # FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected software segmentation to occur, had 12 and 10