From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf, x86: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support for x86_64
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 22:29:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219142933.13904-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219142933.13904-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Implement JIT inlining of the 64-bit bitops kfuncs on x86_64.
bpf_rol64() and bpf_ror64() are always supported via ROL/ROR.
bpf_ctz64() and bpf_ffs64() are supported when the CPU has
X86_FEATURE_BMI1 (TZCNT).
bpf_clz64() and bpf_fls64() are supported when the CPU has
X86_FEATURE_ABM (LZCNT).
bpf_popcnt64() is supported when the CPU has X86_FEATURE_POPCNT.
bpf_bitrev64() is not inlined as x86_64 has no native bit-reverse
instruction, so it falls back to a regular function call.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 141 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 070ba80e39d7..193e1e2d7aa8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <asm/text-patching.h>
#include <asm/unwind.h>
#include <asm/cfi.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeatures.h>
static bool all_callee_regs_used[4] = {true, true, true, true};
@@ -1604,6 +1605,127 @@ static void emit_priv_frame_ptr(u8 **pprog, void __percpu *priv_frame_ptr)
*pprog = prog;
}
+static bool bpf_inlines_func_call(u8 **pprog, void *func)
+{
+ bool has_popcnt = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_POPCNT);
+ bool has_bmi1 = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMI1);
+ bool has_abm = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ABM);
+ bool inlined = true;
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+
+ /*
+ * x86 Bit manipulation instruction set
+ * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_Bit_manipulation_instruction_set
+ */
+
+ if (func == bpf_clz64 && has_abm) {
+ /*
+ * Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (June 2023)
+ *
+ * LZCNT - Count the Number of Leading Zero Bits
+ *
+ * Opcode/Instruction
+ * F3 REX.W 0F BD /r
+ * LZCNT r64, r/m64
+ *
+ * Op/En
+ * RVM
+ *
+ * 64/32-bit Mode
+ * V/N.E.
+ *
+ * CPUID Feature Flag
+ * LZCNT
+ *
+ * Description
+ * Count the number of leading zero bits in r/m64, return
+ * result in r64.
+ */
+ /* emit: x ? 64 - fls64(x) : 64 */
+ /* lzcnt rax, rdi */
+ EMIT5(0xF3, 0x48, 0x0F, 0xBD, 0xC7);
+ } else if (func == bpf_ctz64 && has_bmi1) {
+ /*
+ * Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (June 2023)
+ *
+ * TZCNT - Count the Number of Trailing Zero Bits
+ *
+ * Opcode/Instruction
+ * F3 REX.W 0F BC /r
+ * TZCNT r64, r/m64
+ *
+ * Op/En
+ * RVM
+ *
+ * 64/32-bit Mode
+ * V/N.E.
+ *
+ * CPUID Feature Flag
+ * BMI1
+ *
+ * Description
+ * Count the number of trailing zero bits in r/m64, return
+ * result in r64.
+ */
+ /* emit: x ? __ffs64(x) : 64 */
+ /* tzcnt rax, rdi */
+ EMIT5(0xF3, 0x48, 0x0F, 0xBC, 0xC7);
+ } else if (func == bpf_ffs64 && has_bmi1) {
+ /* emit: __ffs64(x); x == 0 has been handled in verifier */
+ /* tzcnt rax, rdi */
+ EMIT5(0xF3, 0x48, 0x0F, 0xBC, 0xC7);
+ } else if (func == bpf_fls64 && has_abm) {
+ /* emit: fls64(x) */
+ /* lzcnt rax, rdi */
+ EMIT5(0xF3, 0x48, 0x0F, 0xBD, 0xC7);
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0xF7, 0xD8); /* neg rax */
+ EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC0, 0x40); /* add rax, 64 */
+ } else if (func == bpf_popcnt64 && has_popcnt) {
+ /*
+ * Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (June 2023)
+ *
+ * POPCNT - Return the Count of Number of Bits Set to 1
+ *
+ * Opcode/Instruction
+ * F3 REX.W 0F B8 /r
+ * POPCNT r64, r/m64
+ *
+ * Op/En
+ * RM
+ *
+ * 64 Mode
+ * Valid
+ *
+ * Compat/Leg Mode
+ * N.E.
+ *
+ * Description
+ * POPCNT on r/m64
+ */
+ /* popcnt rax, rdi */
+ EMIT5(0xF3, 0x48, 0x0F, 0xB8, 0xC7);
+ } else if (func == bpf_rol64) {
+ EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */
+ /* emit: rol64(x, s) */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xF1); /* mov rcx, rsi */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xF8); /* mov rax, rdi */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0xD3, 0xC0); /* rol rax, cl */
+ EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */
+ } else if (func == bpf_ror64) {
+ EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */
+ /* emit: ror64(x, s) */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xF1); /* mov rcx, rsi */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xF8); /* mov rax, rdi */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0xD3, 0xC8); /* ror rax, cl */
+ EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */
+ } else {
+ inlined = false;
+ }
+
+ *pprog = prog;
+ return inlined;
+}
+
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
#define __LOAD_TCC_PTR(off) \
@@ -2452,6 +2574,8 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
u8 *ip = image + addrs[i - 1];
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
+ if (bpf_inlines_func_call(&prog, func))
+ break;
if (src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && tail_call_reachable) {
LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(stack_depth);
ip += 7;
@@ -4117,3 +4241,20 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
{
return true;
}
+
+bool bpf_jit_inlines_kfunc_call(void *func_addr)
+{
+ if (func_addr == bpf_ctz64 || func_addr == bpf_ffs64)
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMI1);
+
+ if (func_addr == bpf_clz64 || func_addr == bpf_fls64)
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ABM);
+
+ if (func_addr == bpf_popcnt64)
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_POPCNT);
+
+ if (func_addr == bpf_rol64 || func_addr == bpf_ror64)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 14:29 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Introduce 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] " Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-02-19 17:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf, x86: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support for x86_64 Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:54 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-21 12:45 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 16:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-23 16:35 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf, arm64: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 15:10 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:25 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:36 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add __cpu_feature annotation for CPU-feature-gated tests Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add JIT disassembly tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219142933.13904-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox