* [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context
@ 2026-02-20 11:09 Kohei Enju
2026-03-03 23:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-04 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kohei Enju @ 2026-02-20 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, bpf
Cc: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer, John Fastabend, Stanislav Fomichev,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, kohei.enju, Kohei Enju
Since XDP programs are called from a NAPI poll context, the RCU
reference liveness is ensured by local_bh_disable().
Commit aeea1b86f936 ("bpf, devmap: Exclude XDP broadcast to master
device") started to call netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu() from this
context, but missed adding rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as a condition to the
RCU checks.
While both bh_disabled and rcu_read_lock() provide RCU protection,
lockdep complains since the check condition is insufficient [1].
Add rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as condition to help lockdep to understand
the dereference is safe, in the same way as commit 694cea395fde ("bpf:
Allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context").
[1]
WARNING: net/core/dev.c:8099 at netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu+0x96/0xd0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
...
RIP: 0010:netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu+0x96/0xd0
...
<IRQ>
dev_map_enqueue_multi+0x411/0x970
xdp_do_redirect+0xdf2/0x1030
__igc_xdp_run_prog+0x6a0/0xc80
igc_poll+0x34b0/0x70b0
__napi_poll.constprop.0+0x98/0x490
net_rx_action+0x8f2/0xfa0
handle_softirqs+0x1c7/0x710
__irq_exit_rcu+0xb1/0xf0
irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x20
common_interrupt+0x7f/0x90
</IRQ>
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
---
net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 096b3ff13f6b..b99d46b682c6 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -8103,7 +8103,8 @@ struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
{
struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held() &&
+ !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context
2026-02-20 11:09 [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context Kohei Enju
@ 2026-03-03 23:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-04 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2026-03-03 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, Kohei Enju
Cc: netdev, bpf, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer, John Fastabend, Stanislav Fomichev,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, kohei.enju
On 2/20/26 3:09 AM, Kohei Enju wrote:
> Since XDP programs are called from a NAPI poll context, the RCU
> reference liveness is ensured by local_bh_disable().
>
> Commit aeea1b86f936 ("bpf, devmap: Exclude XDP broadcast to master
> device") started to call netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu() from this
> context, but missed adding rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as a condition to the
> RCU checks.
> While both bh_disabled and rcu_read_lock() provide RCU protection,
> lockdep complains since the check condition is insufficient [1].
>
> Add rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as condition to help lockdep to understand
> the dereference is safe, in the same way as commit 694cea395fde ("bpf:
> Allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context").
>
> [1]
> WARNING: net/core/dev.c:8099 at netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu+0x96/0xd0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
> ...
> RIP: 0010:netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu+0x96/0xd0
> ...
> <IRQ>
> dev_map_enqueue_multi+0x411/0x970
> xdp_do_redirect+0xdf2/0x1030
> __igc_xdp_run_prog+0x6a0/0xc80
> igc_poll+0x34b0/0x70b0
> __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x98/0x490
> net_rx_action+0x8f2/0xfa0
> handle_softirqs+0x1c7/0x710
> __irq_exit_rcu+0xb1/0xf0
> irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x20
> common_interrupt+0x7f/0x90
> </IRQ>
>
> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 096b3ff13f6b..b99d46b682c6 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -8103,7 +8103,8 @@ struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
> {
> struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held() &&
lgtm after re-reading some of the threads related to commit 694cea395fde.
Jakub, if it looks good to you also, can you take it to the net-next
tree? Thanks.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> + !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
>
> upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context
2026-02-20 11:09 [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context Kohei Enju
2026-03-03 23:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
@ 2026-03-04 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-04 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kohei Enju
Cc: netdev, bpf, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, ast, daniel,
hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, kohei.enju
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 11:09:17 +0000 you wrote:
> Since XDP programs are called from a NAPI poll context, the RCU
> reference liveness is ensured by local_bh_disable().
>
> Commit aeea1b86f936 ("bpf, devmap: Exclude XDP broadcast to master
> device") started to call netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu() from this
> context, but missed adding rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as a condition to the
> RCU checks.
> While both bh_disabled and rcu_read_lock() provide RCU protection,
> lockdep complains since the check condition is insufficient [1].
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v1,bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/39feb171f361
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-04 1:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-20 11:09 [PATCH v1 bpf-next] net: core: allow netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu from bh context Kohei Enju
2026-03-03 23:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-04 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox