public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: reduce calls to tcp_schedule_loss_probe()
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:35:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223113501.4070245-1-edumazet@google.com> (raw)

For RPC workloads, we alternate tcp_schedule_loss_probe() calls from
output path and from input path, with tp->packets_out value
oscillating between !zero and zero, leading to poor branch prediction.

Move tp->packets_out check from tcp_schedule_loss_probe() to
tcp_set_xmit_timer().

We avoid one call to tcp_schedule_loss_probe() from tcp_ack()
path for typical RPC workloads, while improving branch prediction.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c  | 2 +-
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index e7b41abb82aad33d8cab4fcfa989cc4771149b41..6c3f1d0314446966d0ec4e8efb0b3d83463990d9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3552,7 +3552,7 @@ void tcp_rearm_rto(struct sock *sk)
 /* Try to schedule a loss probe; if that doesn't work, then schedule an RTO. */
 static void tcp_set_xmit_timer(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (!tcp_schedule_loss_probe(sk, true))
+	if (!tcp_sk(sk)->packets_out || !tcp_schedule_loss_probe(sk, true))
 		tcp_rearm_rto(sk);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 326b58ff1118d02fc396753d56f210f9d3007c7f..ada38dd9cef477e16ff77544bbdd057d695fa978 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -3116,7 +3116,7 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk, bool advancing_rto)
 	 * not in loss recovery, that are either limited by cwnd or application.
 	 */
 	if ((early_retrans != 3 && early_retrans != 4) ||
-	    !tp->packets_out || !tcp_is_sack(tp) ||
+	    !tcp_is_sack(tp) ||
 	    (icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Open &&
 	     icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_CWR))
 		return false;
-- 
2.53.0.345.g96ddfc5eaa-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 11:35 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2026-02-23 15:47 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: reduce calls to tcp_schedule_loss_probe() Neal Cardwell
2026-02-23 19:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-02-25  2:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260223113501.4070245-1-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox