From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: Drop the lock in skb_may_tx_timestamp()
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:27:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223152738.7e8e95fb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223170750.q5nhbkSe@linutronix.de>
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:07:50 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> How do we move forward? Merge this, backport stable and then convert
> in-tree user away from IRQ delivery _or_ fix the driver one by one and
> backport them stable? Or…
If we plan to convert in-tree users away from IRQ delivery I'd do that
directly, without applying this patch. But I'll let Paolo have the final
word. Eric's review tag seems to indicate to me that he disagrees.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 18:38 [PATCH net v2] net: Drop the lock in skb_may_tx_timestamp() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-20 21:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-20 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-20 21:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-20 22:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-23 17:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-23 23:27 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-24 9:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-24 10:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-21 0:45 ` Jason Xing
2026-02-23 8:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-24 10:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-02-26 8:11 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2026-02-26 8:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260223152738.7e8e95fb@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox