public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>,
	syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 07:39:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260228073959.0ef1b33f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228031400.163009-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 11:13:59 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
> 
> fib_check_nexthop() does not validate that the nexthop family matches
> the route family. This allows an IPv4 route to reference an IPv6
> nexthop object. When the IPv4 route is looked up, __mkroute_output()
> accesses nhc->nhc_pcpu_rth_output which is never allocated for IPv6
> nexthops (fib6_nh_init does not call fib_nh_common_init), causing a
> NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> Note that this is not about IPv4 routes with IPv6 gateways (RFC 5549),
> which uses an AF_INET nexthop with nhc_gw_family=AF_INET6 and properly
> allocates nhc_pcpu_rth_output via fib_nh_common_init(). The bug here
> is an AF_INET6 nexthop object being directly referenced by an IPv4
> route, which is an invalid combination.
> 
> Add the missing family check in fib_check_nexthop(), mirroring what
> fib6_check_nexthop() already does for the reverse direction (rejecting
> IPv6 routes that reference IPv4 nexthop objects).

AFAICT this breaks a bunch of tests, quickest to repro with is
gre_multipath_nh.sh but you should probably run fib_nexthops.sh
on your fix as well.

> Reproducer:
> 
>   unshare -rn
>   ip link set lo up
>   ip nexthop add id 100 via fe80::1 dev lo
>   ip route add 172.20.20.0/24 nhid 100
>   ping -c1 172.20.20.1
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-28 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-28  3:13 [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop Jiayuan Chen
2026-02-28 15:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-28 16:33   ` David Ahern
2026-02-28 17:04     ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-01  1:57       ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-01 18:05         ` David Ahern
2026-03-01 18:11         ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260228073959.0ef1b33f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@shopee.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox