* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-02-28 18:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error Sean Chang
@ 2026-02-28 22:59 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-01 0:10 ` kernel test robot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-02-28 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Chang, Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang
Hi Sean,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all]
[also build test WARNING on trondmy-nfs/linux-next net/main net-next/main linus/master v7.0-rc1 next-20260227]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Chang/sunrpc-simplify-dfprintk-macros-and-fix-nfsd-build-error/20260301-040617
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260228180821.811683-2-seanwascoding%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
config: i386-randconfig-001-20260301 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010612.uRmHYMsi-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010612.uRmHYMsi-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603010612.uRmHYMsi-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:31,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:193,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from fs/lockd/svclock.c:25:
fs/lockd/svclock.c: In function 'nlmsvc_lookup_block':
fs/lockd/svclock.c:163:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'nlmdbg_cookie2a' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:134:32: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~
>> fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:25: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *', but argument 7 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
......
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
include/linux/printk.h:134:25: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:72: note: format string is defined here
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ~^
| |
| char *
| %d
fs/lockd/svclock.c: In function 'nlmsvc_find_block':
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:17: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
include/linux/printk.h:134:25: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ^~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:37: note: format string is defined here
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ~^
| |
| char *
| %d
vim +159 fs/lockd/svclock.c
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 141
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 142 /*
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 143 * Find a block for a given lock
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 144 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 145 static struct nlm_block *
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 146 nlmsvc_lookup_block(struct nlm_file *file, struct nlm_lock *lock)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 147 {
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 148 struct nlm_block *block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 149 struct file_lock *fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 150
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 151 dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_lookup_block f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 152 file, lock->fl.c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 153 (long long)lock->fl.fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 154 (long long)lock->fl.fl_end,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 155 lock->fl.c.flc_type);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 156 spin_lock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 157 list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) {
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 158 fl = &block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @159 dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 160 block->b_file, fl->c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 161 (long long)fl->fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 162 (long long)fl->fl_end, fl->c.flc_type,
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 163 nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 164 if (block->b_file == file && nlm_compare_locks(fl, &lock->fl)) {
6849c0cab69f5d Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 165 kref_get(&block->b_count);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 166 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 167 return block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 168 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 169 }
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 170 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 171
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 172 return NULL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 173 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 174
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-02-28 18:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error Sean Chang
2026-02-28 22:59 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-03-01 0:10 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-01 0:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-02 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-03-01 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Chang, Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang
Hi Sean,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all]
[also build test ERROR on trondmy-nfs/linux-next net/main net-next/main linus/master v7.0-rc1 next-20260227]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Chang/sunrpc-simplify-dfprintk-macros-and-fix-nfsd-build-error/20260301-040617
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260228180821.811683-2-seanwascoding%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
config: i386-randconfig-001-20260301 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010852.3RKXCwyF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010852.3RKXCwyF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603010852.3RKXCwyF-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:31,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:193,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from fs/lockd/svclock.c:25:
fs/lockd/svclock.c: In function 'nlmsvc_lookup_block':
>> fs/lockd/svclock.c:163:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'nlmdbg_cookie2a' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:134:32: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:25: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *', but argument 7 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
......
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
include/linux/printk.h:134:25: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ^~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:159:72: note: format string is defined here
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ~^
| |
| char *
| %d
fs/lockd/svclock.c: In function 'nlmsvc_find_block':
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:17: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
include/linux/printk.h:134:25: note: in definition of macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dfprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dprintk'
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ^~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:37: note: format string is defined here
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ~^
| |
| char *
| %d
vim +/nlmdbg_cookie2a +163 fs/lockd/svclock.c
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 141
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 142 /*
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 143 * Find a block for a given lock
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 144 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 145 static struct nlm_block *
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 146 nlmsvc_lookup_block(struct nlm_file *file, struct nlm_lock *lock)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 147 {
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 148 struct nlm_block *block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 149 struct file_lock *fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 150
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 151 dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_lookup_block f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 152 file, lock->fl.c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 153 (long long)lock->fl.fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 154 (long long)lock->fl.fl_end,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 155 lock->fl.c.flc_type);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 156 spin_lock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 157 list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) {
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 158 fl = &block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 159 dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 160 block->b_file, fl->c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 161 (long long)fl->fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 162 (long long)fl->fl_end, fl->c.flc_type,
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 @163 nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 164 if (block->b_file == file && nlm_compare_locks(fl, &lock->fl)) {
6849c0cab69f5d Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 165 kref_get(&block->b_count);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 166 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 167 return block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 168 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 169 }
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 170 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 171
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 172 return NULL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 173 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 174
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-02-28 18:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error Sean Chang
2026-02-28 22:59 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-01 0:10 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-03-01 0:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-02 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-03-01 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Chang, Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang
Hi Sean,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all]
[also build test WARNING on trondmy-nfs/linux-next net/main net-next/main linus/master v7.0-rc1 next-20260227]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Chang/sunrpc-simplify-dfprintk-macros-and-fix-nfsd-build-error/20260301-040617
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260228180821.811683-2-seanwascoding%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
config: i386-randconfig-141-20260301 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010808.w3TtG6fC-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
smatch version: v0.5.0-8994-gd50c5a4c
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260301/202603010808.w3TtG6fC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603010808.w3TtG6fC-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/lockd/svclock.c:163:5: error: call to undeclared function 'nlmdbg_cookie2a'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ^
>> fs/lockd/svclock.c:163:5: warning: format specifies type 'char *' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat]
159 | dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
| ~~
| %d
160 | block->b_file, fl->c.flc_pid,
161 | (long long)fl->fl_start,
162 | (long long)fl->fl_end, fl->c.flc_type,
163 | nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:28: note: expanded from macro 'dprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:55:40: note: expanded from macro 'dfprintk'
55 | # define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:134:18: note: expanded from macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:47: error: call to undeclared function 'nlmdbg_cookie2a'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ^
fs/lockd/svclock.c:202:47: warning: format specifies type 'char *' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat]
202 | dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
| ~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| %d
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:23:28: note: expanded from macro 'dprintk'
23 | dfprintk(FACILITY, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h:55:40: note: expanded from macro 'dfprintk'
55 | # define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:134:18: note: expanded from macro 'no_printk'
134 | _printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +163 fs/lockd/svclock.c
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 141
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 142 /*
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 143 * Find a block for a given lock
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 144 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 145 static struct nlm_block *
d9f6eb75d49007 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 146 nlmsvc_lookup_block(struct nlm_file *file, struct nlm_lock *lock)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 147 {
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 148 struct nlm_block *block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 149 struct file_lock *fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 150
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 151 dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_lookup_block f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 152 file, lock->fl.c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 153 (long long)lock->fl.fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 154 (long long)lock->fl.fl_end,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 155 lock->fl.c.flc_type);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 156 spin_lock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
68a2d76cea4234 Olaf Kirch 2006-10-04 157 list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) {
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 158 fl = &block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 159 dprintk("lockd: check f=%p pd=%d %Ld-%Ld ty=%d cookie=%s\n",
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 160 block->b_file, fl->c.flc_pid,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 161 (long long)fl->fl_start,
eb8ed7c6ab08cd Jeff Layton 2024-01-31 162 (long long)fl->fl_end, fl->c.flc_type,
92737230dd3f14 Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 @163 nlmdbg_cookie2a(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie));
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 164 if (block->b_file == file && nlm_compare_locks(fl, &lock->fl)) {
6849c0cab69f5d Trond Myklebust 2006-03-20 165 kref_get(&block->b_count);
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 166 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 167 return block;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 168 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 169 }
be2be5f7f44364 Alexander Aring 2023-07-20 170 spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 171
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 172 return NULL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 173 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 174
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-02-28 18:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error Sean Chang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-01 0:31 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-03-02 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-02 13:13 ` Sean Chang
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2026-03-02 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Chang
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna, netdev, linux-nfs,
linux-kernel
Hi Sean,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 at 22:29, Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> wrote:
> When CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG is disabled, the dfprintk() macros currently
> expand to empty do-while loops. This causes variables used solely
> within these calls to appear unused, triggering -Wunused-variable
> warnings.
>
> Following David Laight's suggestion, simplify the macro definitions by
> removing the unnecessary 'fmt' argument and using no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> directly. This ensures the compiler performs type checking and "sees"
> the variables, silencing the warnings without emitting any code.
>
> Additionally, fix a build error in fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c reported by syzbot.
> In nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(), the variable 'buf' is conditionally
> defined via RPC_IFDEBUG. Since no_printk() now performs type checking,
> it triggers an 'undeclared identifier' error when debug is disabled.
> Wrap the dprintk call in an #if block to synchronize its lifecycle
> with 'buf', following the pattern in svc_rdma_transport.c.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69a2e269.050a0220.3a55be.003e.GAE@google.com/
> Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
This should have been fixed alteady, cfr.
"Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sunrpc: Fix `make W=1` build issues"?
https://lore.kernel.org/177024270291.126397.9981743455921781902.b4-ty@oracle.com
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> index ed85dd43da18..f7386fd483a6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> @@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ static __be32 nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> /* Check if the request originated from a secure port. */
> if (rqstp && !nfsd_originating_port_ok(rqstp, cred, exp)) {
> RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]);
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
> dprintk("nfsd: request from insecure port %s!\n",
> svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
> +#endif
> return nfserr_perm;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
> index eb4bd62df319..cb33c7e1f370 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
> @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ do { \
> # define RPC_IFDEBUG(x) x
> #else
> # define ifdebug(fac) if (0)
> -# define dfprintk(fac, fmt, ...) do {} while (0)
> -# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, fmt, ...) do {} while (0)
> +# define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> +# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> # define RPC_IFDEBUG(x)
> #endif
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-03-02 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2026-03-02 13:13 ` Sean Chang
2026-03-02 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sean Chang @ 2026-03-02 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna, netdev, linux-nfs,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 5:41 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> This should have been fixed alteady, cfr.
> "Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sunrpc: Fix `make W=1` build issues"?
> https://lore.kernel.org/177024270291.126397.9981743455921781902.b4-ty@oracle.com
>
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback. Regarding the patch you mentioned, I've
actually addressed this in the v6 series sent yesterday [1].
My v6 approach is cleaner for a few reasons:
1. Compiler Optimization: In v6, we don't need explicit
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG) checks in files like
fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c. With -O2, the compiler already proves these branches
are unreachable and optimizes them away automatically.
2. Eliminating Redundancy: In include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h, the patch
you cited adds no_printk inside an else branch of ifdebug, which is
redundant. Since no_printk already performs type checking via
##__VA_ARGS__, simply refactoring the macro is sufficient:
-# define dfprintk(fac, fmt, ...) do {} while (0)
+# define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
3. Reducing Stubs: This also avoids the need for extra stub functions
when CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG is disabled, as seen in fs/lockd/svclock.c.
This v6 series has already been reviewed by Andrew Lunn. I would
appreciate it if you could take a look at the updated logic there.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260301161709.1365975-1-seanwascoding@gmail.com/T/#u
Best Regards,
Sean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-03-02 13:13 ` Sean Chang
@ 2026-03-02 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-02 13:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2026-03-02 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Chang
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna, netdev, linux-nfs,
linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko
CC Andy
On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 at 14:13, Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 5:41 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > This should have been fixed alteady, cfr.
> > "Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sunrpc: Fix `make W=1` build issues"?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/177024270291.126397.9981743455921781902.b4-ty@oracle.com
> >
>
> Hi Geert,
> Thanks for the feedback. Regarding the patch you mentioned, I've
> actually addressed this in the v6 series sent yesterday [1].
>
> My v6 approach is cleaner for a few reasons:
> 1. Compiler Optimization: In v6, we don't need explicit
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG) checks in files like
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c. With -O2, the compiler already proves these branches
> are unreachable and optimizes them away automatically.
>
> 2. Eliminating Redundancy: In include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h, the patch
> you cited adds no_printk inside an else branch of ifdebug, which is
> redundant. Since no_printk already performs type checking via
> ##__VA_ARGS__, simply refactoring the macro is sufficient:
> -# define dfprintk(fac, fmt, ...) do {} while (0)
> +# define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
>
> 3. Reducing Stubs: This also avoids the need for extra stub functions
> when CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG is disabled, as seen in fs/lockd/svclock.c.
>
> This v6 series has already been reviewed by Andrew Lunn. I would
> appreciate it if you could take a look at the updated logic there.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260301161709.1365975-1-seanwascoding@gmail.com/T/#u
>
> Best Regards,
> Sean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sunrpc: simplify dfprintk macros and fix nfsd build error
2026-03-02 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2026-03-02 13:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2026-03-02 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Sean Chang, Andrew Lunn, Chuck Lever, David Laight, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, trond.myklebust, anna, netdev, linux-nfs,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> CC Andy
Thanks!
Recently Chuck updated his nfsd-next, so please rebase and resend, Cc'ing me.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread