From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A15830148B; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 01:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772501584; cv=none; b=IC1u+8cBCK7alKO4itomJZzWpkl8RpsJC/yQBr34lvYXwdcV5q7PMoBm/FE0Pc/BdLhBL0kh/0gahgP0mt4XTOnLuyU/BoAdmOLFJN4PysT/MXNtfSUtgLEJ3T+tWW6lj/A9DbEFwkVr2UT/cginq/2rzt5kqEqDevF6H8s5Uvs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772501584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IUUZMklsuDqt9XDyM9yk4sjEMlG0JCQemvWf3MVHwlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W5HJdpj9BRDpMqJhCD1ZQR/vRK0cRVlBhK8lbM+WU8g4r9e0IhWFBk5/fFmJlKCqZqkvpQxSY5BCSixaZtpQpxjW+AWQG5bnkl51sMZnLI70s3rUfTW7cezop2PSnuN6rrMwrmISf2jnIcFr9YB2P8JoA3MaDmcxwSu+anffkPs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Bj1dklSB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Bj1dklSB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C9B6C19423; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 01:33:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772501583; bh=IUUZMklsuDqt9XDyM9yk4sjEMlG0JCQemvWf3MVHwlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bj1dklSB20+0Kay/8hcYBsj29heJW2oqguhj7spRmyhM8d0TF6NbRWyKNGDjZ0Dvc 3Rsq1JnW2WuGk36M6P9w8+MsFx3wVl0cKkz1lJ3lKIcsUBw3b0qMznwdouEHq/5j+D y2NfYxMS7DzP0mRyTdHMgbTDhEWqm3fwYSqBaiEA1LlKLXR/BBSSvRM6QWRavvlv8Y 8XdtHbycUO3SV91pgi4YKG/ExD+oYobj3cmt580hxvcoAs4thhzmQKrSz9yDnJDeOO zmIS4Js6XenCLxEAoTRCF4Ax4M3T9MWRg4om8OmUzj0Y9It+csZRPF2eS20yPnZV0e JlGtq4Bm1NpEg== Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 17:33:02 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Allison Henderson Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, allison.henderson@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] selftests: rds: refactor and expand rds selftests test Message-ID: <20260302173302.4d1634be@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260302055518.301620-1-achender@kernel.org> References: <20260302055518.301620-1-achender@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 22:55:16 -0700 Allison Henderson wrote: > This series aims to improve the current rds selftests. The first patch > refactors the existing test.py such that the networking set up can be > reused as general purpose infrastructure for other tests. The existing > send and receive code is hoisted into a separate rds_basic.py. The next > patch adds a new rds_stress.py that exercises RDS via the external > rds-stress tool from the rds-tools package if it is available on the host. > We add two new flags to test.py, -b and -s to select rds_basic or > rds_stress respectively. The intent is to make the RDS selftests more > modular and extensible. Let me know what you all think. > > Questions, comments, suggestions appreciated! IDK Allison. I tried to integrate the remaining tests with Netdev CI this weekend. The two groups of networking tests which can't be run like all the other selftests are vsock and RDS. I get vsock being different. vsock is used to communicate between VMs and host, setting up the vms with the locally built kernel makes it different. But I'm not exactly sure what makes RDS different. Would you mind explaining the challenges with fitting RDS into the ksft framework?