From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8907E19ADB0; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 03:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772507690; cv=none; b=CvEEFXqQxKvskZrjAv9mLWE80LJmEPQIdGhPfSLBnt4BEr10yR23uvrvE4nvSOuGylRIbcNpcxXQEw5emspwk75bSS3gH4cjlG7mIBMBfBx9mgMGSDtiCMOgNvuRx+leJyxpP9xps9xV+iWkg4PHMLzIvDbvvlTphWihZEyYupo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772507690; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fkufFEILEgr60R+q2FwGShsko0FhfpQaQOtbm/Dl9K4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q8CuQjMveLmsawwaZOIGZj5jQ0XCxmPOjIXqCCw0mc2UEnLqnl4F9mXaiqWUEB78A2tos7dYZ/AUxUDfRCWSDC9bwVgDyWBsHSMgsBEvWLGS5KbmP1X9OE61zQjUpUUjtkQy6d/LX3CJ3jgXle66tg0zZhLL4WZkmavwcjVse7U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LQWu+XoT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LQWu+XoT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D74BC19423; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 03:14:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772507690; bh=fkufFEILEgr60R+q2FwGShsko0FhfpQaQOtbm/Dl9K4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LQWu+XoTYOcyh6LMYgIvXa4ZEZxcfojfe2Q2usEm7VJYdH8P+ffjashH8Ygx8Ffae hL2gZcpVXUw9Dz5Wt/QGR6NCli7MmCl1DbCEkUxww/Kf+HY7ESarYtoW65iXumnhYM svKRVTBBGb03Huh87q+TbbsTTi75DZOK1l7ic+jg83K+SHRzSJ0bFvE0tMJH3d4CzG QMlh/9/VdVpIveRArncztY1q+VVvKugReQP+6t/a7LEsDrbdShUGHPbroKnyAU8+R4 jF/xXs7MKNuzPiysgBSYvrjkXeFUrubm6YneeGizHm1VtobgW395tSZFXd7/fJ7T41 m/fSJEjatpoqQ== Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 19:14:48 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Donald Hunter , Jiri Pirko , Jonathan Corbet , Saeed Mahameed , "Leon Romanovsky" , Mark Bloch , Shuah Khan , , , , , , Gal Pressman , Dragos Tatulea , Shay Drory , Jiri Pirko , Moshe Shemesh , Or Har-Toov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 10/10] devlink: Document port-level resources Message-ID: <20260302191448.4750a2b8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260226221916.1800227-11-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20260226221916.1800227-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20260226221916.1800227-11-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:19:16 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote: > +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing > +resource information. In case there is v4, AI says: > +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing ^^^^^ This isn't a bug, but the terminology here appears inconsistent with the rest of the documentation. The document uses user-facing command names elsewhere (like "devlink port resource show"), but this line uses "GET command" which seems to reference the internal DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_RESOURCE_GET netlink command. Should this be reworded to match the user-facing terminology used throughout the rest of the document, perhaps "only support the show command" or "only support viewing"?