From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80B73932CA for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 21:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772573965; cv=none; b=dH2cEYj1CWtYXrFM7OtxD/KLZ9WFpsa53cgNDW9hhpX4fRaIe52Y74W48TbKIOYpkOtCjI2cZjKfOBxINVdEL3ZmWkQESqvR3IYTItNEVFG3UxDln+mwvaK+e5guEd2EJliAp7SLNARE5cJTKz7LD8AHsbj0nNBS4cPPJ+HFCuo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772573965; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OLJWTlRGDuIiR/Zh7tw5KqJKXc0XWmrhsZuf51N4z2Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OXt351+59FIavyASr611XXLBxOT7gcORdvgx24Fn5HDXf9GpVUz/3J32EJwk8JMjK2lI5o/RZEyGbvWywaPYemUdVBbY7sgroGDY90W+IxT/fB6wZxIRTG8b3RevEV//nO3MTEAOOBdYHy7fWr1L9ikBKdcAi/vlonSfMyIle70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RiYwbY84; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RiYwbY84" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32BDAC116C6; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 21:39:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772573965; bh=OLJWTlRGDuIiR/Zh7tw5KqJKXc0XWmrhsZuf51N4z2Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RiYwbY84G3WNFKWJ2vzkrDvGqoFUX5qgEQQJ1VQZsoEEcOG8tZCxaXAUhGNHczyFx fpthxpOVvaqeE08Y5bV5hFbNnX5hC5vP6pD9of/QDjlsuBavJTScHvq1hlifse0GLx c9G5GMRDt722ropSAzPUlEfWjVA787OeshzgqQUyl6DUUk3fHS3F1djGzvLOiZBk+w lYY2TlXo++yhSyScnKJJjbTXQVQM5sPt0rACWT0Rr9SuIKtJuKKPcz7B2T9+rh+v2T gRBHGmHjvSka5WdWHncMadTYGVTdrFeHXsj6CmfaNpTxDuLVaCnw9UNxmmTWPc48jv odHBJvlZkazrA== Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 13:39:24 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Sabrina Dubroca , Paolo Abeni , Ralf Lici Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-02-28 Message-ID: <20260303133924.521ed6cb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <74f8c9d9-eac7-4681-b3ee-8ab2b20b7904@openvpn.net> References: <20260227235955.660-1-antonio@openvpn.net> <433139b8-3aea-4db1-8ed6-959ac445cd27@openvpn.net> <20260228170104.1ec4c133@kernel.org> <74f8c9d9-eac7-4681-b3ee-8ab2b20b7904@openvpn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 22:02:24 +0100 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > # timeout set to 45 > > # selftests: net/ovpn: test-chachapoly.sh > > # Creating interface tun0 with mode 1 > > # Creating interface tun1 with mode 0 > > # Creating interface tun2 with mode 0 > > # Creating interface tun3 with mode 0 > > # Creating interface tun4 with mode 0 > > # Creating interface tun5 with mode 0 > > # Creating interface tun6 with mode 0 > > # kernel error: Unknown attribute type > > Maybe you didn't unload the ovpn.ko you built *without* the patchset > applied? > > This line above makes me think you are using the newer selftests (from > the patchset), but without kernel support for a new attribute, > introduced in patch 6. Yes, embarrassingly looking thru the logs I may have actually booting the wrong kernel to test the "after the series" state. Let's see how it looks when this series is merged. I added the tests to the runner, they are just ignore for now: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-net-extra&pw-y=0