From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Cc: "achender@kernel.org" <achender@kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"rds-devel@oss.oracle.com" <rds-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] selftests: rds: refactor and expand rds selftests test
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 10:32:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260304103212.2e7a58ba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18aa553886ee12855c28d9498b12d2fdaeee9b3c.camel@oracle.com>
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 02:50:34 +0000 Allison Henderson wrote:
> I didnt know it was causing you grief, but I am happy to work with
> you to adapt it. RDS is a little unique in that the network topology
> defines the underlying transport it uses. If you were to run it with
> just a pair of veth interfaces on a single host or vm, then you will
> only be using the loop back transport in rds.ko. In order to get it
> to load and test rds_tcp.ko, we need the endpoints to be in separate
> network namespaces so that the destination IP isn't seen as local. So
> the test case does this by forking server/client processes across
> name spaces. There really isnt a rush on this series, so if you
> think we should do some refactoring/cleanup for ksft first that is
> fine. Let me know your thoughts.
IIUC the need to set up a veth + 2 name spaces topology is very common.
We have bash "libraries" / helpers in various lib.sh files to do it.
Python libs also have some support (tho the default linking there is
by pairing two netdevsim devices).
Well, maybe to be clear I should say that we _even_ have support in
libraries for this. Not really strongly opposed to you rolling your own
way of setting up the namespaces at this point. I primarily care about
us being able to execute all your tests in our CI, with standard ksft
commands. Maybe I did something wrong but
make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=net/rds run_tests
did not work for me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 5:55 [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] selftests: rds: refactor and expand rds selftests test Allison Henderson
2026-03-02 5:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] selftests: rds: Refactor test.py Allison Henderson
2026-03-02 5:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] selftests: rds: Add rds_stress.py Allison Henderson
2026-03-03 1:33 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] selftests: rds: refactor and expand rds selftests test Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-04 2:50 ` Allison Henderson
2026-03-04 18:32 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-06 7:43 ` Allison Henderson
2026-03-06 20:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260304103212.2e7a58ba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox