From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2348D264A65; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772679060; cv=none; b=Vr4mC5SgNYg4fb/Qm93OONSEKnSGtZIjajiJncnD/Mi/oW0dP5eX8wO2VvTUuf3e8qaEzUR7Tk89lMoWx1L0x+F05tVGzlCxp8ksezlVvGZZTLp4xOVbW8Or5jLalNpH9vQKd02RZptYCK1jePy6GoPhC69GeT81SlXuZ8WMqm4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772679060; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pUydlp0JDyvoilaKO0EdUKvO26qTKH0x97z1hOtea+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TR2cXyYtTBs0DC0h9yqIN/8bPh81rNBJ69rMcZEaveI5WgnlwUaIFRHxOz54lD5TJSh4YEOqjipP3pj5JdxqIxTwd6+ByVUUOkZ/Gss0iVXGU2pIs6q1tHLp8ecKQS9EXI6mtR3kagHTzAdJhpWhlM1HOGWr/YipLntEP3eyc3Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GfQU6x/A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GfQU6x/A" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D8FDC4CEF7; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:50:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772679059; bh=pUydlp0JDyvoilaKO0EdUKvO26qTKH0x97z1hOtea+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GfQU6x/ApJyFbfHjCkGwdK/UVyTJgS5zf4KaU8s/8c6TZ3AIGRcwxxYSajcJ32mfT /+OcOgSPZ5qH0eaJCPYSq+FsKdU/e9bwwEe8/49PEtRlvG/6vwUJY4ClSQdYv0wTO8 ntw7jt600tM0bbDlqWsLVhgxFCwjWHgp0unJSjOCvQ2ljwI0APutDEJ90XzojyHpWi 3QKKK1O2ypZXOcCa0QKSZQQEgG/0G+TwiPVeTwVAP0dYFIDeajJ2qUsR/UsCvOJu3M wkIKvrc62sjLCecZB4uudV+76FGov7+W2YpB10cCZx2Ukev2DuR437WAMIrsx2pcMQ Iorhkxsol+eqQ== Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 18:50:56 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera , David Ahern , "Ricardo B. =?UTF-8?B?TWFybGnDqHJl?=" , Martin KaFai Lau , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4?= =?UTF-8?B?aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= , Jay Vosburgh , Andrew Lunn , Hangbin Liu , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bpf: bpf_out_neigh_v4: Fix nd_tbl NULL dereference when IPv6 is disabled Message-ID: <20260304185056.4ef945d4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260228-net-nd_tbl_fixes-v1-0-2b2a274df9bb@suse.com> <20260228-net-nd_tbl_fixes-v1-1-2b2a274df9bb@suse.com> <0b52257d-d557-4f26-9931-34c81ab621bc@iogearbox.net> <20260302171131.28373ccb@kernel.org> <0d7bb5c5-4122-4dc9-b52b-c305591207d1@suse.de> <525dab04-4e64-49cf-94d9-12084e146b80@iogearbox.net> <20260304174327.0a48ff45@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:59:27 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> I presume you mean disable_ipv6_mod which then bails out during the module > >> load process without error, right? It could be deprecated with a warning so > >> that it turns into a no-op: > > > > I believe disabling ipv6 may be legit. Some admins on ipv4 networks may > > be paranoid and not want to allow any ipv6 traffic if their "firewalls" > > can only understand IPv6? This is just a guess on my side, but I'm less > > confident of deprecating the disable knob than =m. I'd be happy if I'm > > wrong. > > > > To answer the earlier question -- I would prefer to take the fixes now > > and make IPv6 bool in net-next, feels like too big of a change for rc3 > > :( > > Makes sense, I think starting this process via net-next is fine and can be > better justified. Fernando, maybe in that case resend with the unlikely() > added. I think Fernando was chiming in because he sent similar patches. Ricardo, please respin checking ipv6_mod_disabled() ?