From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E3B3A7F72 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772721673; cv=none; b=Yji9Q0ukdo0NyLM0z/aBCnp6yam6RWD4AB14gr5I9rXJ7wv5gWHELZV+YNURNZTt3g1k6rUbgx+cLbNqOFNAbcIYmXD1bI46YnMiBpFqQs165Ex8PyCGEhSFtInDNEwPrOzAIJ9yXQO+ZG/3fkMwRJwvD5bpCBIz9qRQ8obbMc0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772721673; c=relaxed/simple; bh=29E5SYsL7g1a74W55CNChrjD/XSjGkHLYxTnYHb+NHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Tpklb6cftUYD2lDLknIX+qyn5pzvCmvgs9CtvL0Zh3azwCTNNALwQp0VTjU7kDxj4pzcR+uWYQnNpUTB10buHngzxDzeAmLVW+I7kdvm6RSdz4Rjg7AbihT9pk1UWTLJSsk9M2pkT4BqNv8PGh+yJ/s9tzDYskrlDrvTM6CJW88= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=J/bYLO1b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="J/bYLO1b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62DE5C116C6; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:41:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772721673; bh=29E5SYsL7g1a74W55CNChrjD/XSjGkHLYxTnYHb+NHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J/bYLO1bXEDbCXGK3cjgxuxYa/k1sFXUzfav/feb9gSOe+Gy798Nt16Zalxsj6Zn/ 2gUb+IDTC2lQBj8sd9A6BuEsa9rD0or3gBxq67RjIiAZU7GIU0Xfjid6flv3u+Sr4a kPdVnzmTRrdguQyQCjXSz5hBD/zoonj+JZYkg/C5zWP+oJFFR7wVRVf4N+xLjc29HR b4SasVFa81xgZlTpR+Vv/3OI9juccHy/+m4wL4GXs3RMHr2tcxKPJPxqa8DsAk0+M9 vLEpbjQRYTIU4UOtJSA2A0uqULytF9wbT/Pd+TTLe9YMUJrY4rliEyDElPBnmHVqjP 9+DA+SI3L230g== Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 06:41:11 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Willem de Bruijn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Felix Maurer , Paolo Abeni , Richard Cochran , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/2] hsr: Allow to send a specific port and with HSR header Message-ID: <20260305064111.13fe5e0b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260305080731.xnJ0XtTX@linutronix.de> References: <20260204-hsr_ptp-v1-0-b421c69a77da@linutronix.de> <20260204-hsr_ptp-v1-1-b421c69a77da@linutronix.de> <20260304145821.TQhzhhjF@linutronix.de> <20260304161255.VV_7vPBw@linutronix.de> <20260305080731.xnJ0XtTX@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 09:07:31 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Let me redo this with the skb-extension variant. Expect opposition. HSR is an Orphan full of trouble already and what you're trying to do very much feels like a one off hack to me. Can't the Tx path be done with an egress redirect on the HSR upper?