From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Lici <ralf@mandelbit.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 12:57:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306125738.73a17bb4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3197cdc-83db-4739-966c-018f8570070d@openvpn.net>
On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:05:53 +0100 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > There should probably be an else branch which prints some kind of
> > echo "SKIP - requirements missing"
> >
> > Your requirements.py script prints stuff but the output needs to
> > contain the word SKIP
>
> If "has_listener_requirements" is false, the test script still goes on,
> but it won't check the received netlink notification content.
>
> So we're not really skipping the whole test, just one specific check
> that requires extra tooling (which is normally found on all standard
> distros).
>
>
> Do you think we should rather SKIP the whole test so that we can easily
> spot that something is missing?
No strong preference. But speaking speaking just from the netdev CI
perspective it's probably best to report SKIP and then keep going.
The system does string matches on the output. If we report FAIL after
the pass it will show as FAIL, if it's SKIP + PASS the report will be
SKIP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 23:06 [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-03-05 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] selftests: ovpn: allow compiling ovpn-cli.c with mbedtls3 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] ovpn: use correct array size to parse nested attributes in ovpn_nl_key_swap_doit Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] ovpn: pktid: use bitops.h API Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] ovpn: notify userspace on client float event Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 3:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-06 13:05 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 20:57 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-06 21:03 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 21:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-06 21:12 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 21:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] ovpn: add support for asymmetric peer IDs Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] selftests: ovpn: check asymmetric peer-id Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 3:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-06 13:19 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] selftests: ovpn: add test for the FW mark feature Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-06 3:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-04 23:06 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] ovpn: consolidate crypto allocations in one chunk Antonio Quartulli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-17 10:40 [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-03-17 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-17 10:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-13 20:51 [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-03-13 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-13 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-10 14:49 [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-03-10 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-10 14:50 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-12 3:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-13 10:52 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-02-27 23:59 [PATCH net-next 0/9] pull request: ovpn 2026-02-28 Antonio Quartulli
2026-02-27 23:59 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] selftests: ovpn: add notification parsing and matching Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306125738.73a17bb4@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@mandelbit.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox