From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5721A6821; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772807080; cv=none; b=s0faoZUXWZPyNQeEJONgmrqN0+6JIH5fMoKg390eOFixnNIqyXr3ek5HqTTnSpf8mZL7prLN7CJsEYi3vCzXeHxKqhJoBjciN3DX/sHmT1coKSznHy9Pmkzaz3rQ0cnZpQkuOQ7RmrBg5DFaNZV9c0LgVd4E3zLuxSWIynrlpqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772807080; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rI4ryq8KZf+a00K5dlAbYNQ2TI+H+3gBJALRx1ZwXsk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=N2Xz0Vj5Az2K8rEJd+XqjPaBUPuBh2OD2HZIdbWueed/r1fYFXBlZQkWESXVBqTMAaI5rFdjqhA8pI1B9Svid35CJ1ePCkOqmGH+kcj4uA3UcRBFBr6mjTy4exwSPL8afo0ywLXYtjFagf66ol2vHMUoXVugtKPvBg+A0FjD05c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uzJm0ows; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uzJm0ows" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30031C4CEF7; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:24:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772807080; bh=rI4ryq8KZf+a00K5dlAbYNQ2TI+H+3gBJALRx1ZwXsk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uzJm0owssArBal9Ng5DRFON9urN/z8qjY5QUDsjqOEQ8S6xXnNWe+4LA+Tnq+L6Rm wjGXGRpD/v/tadNlqPkD02di1aRAYJBAlyiyoNfwlq/1/c3O1rNB2enhMf/bsdvtDw 7XDM7Vj9CmuP5zZEUdMnssK8C2yjGHD5jtKv9zIDq8dxrMdtkLiuIa5oTqcFkMyfGJ +wyXzdI7Kg5sYzuL/IagHlsVQpvX8Mzre4BLr9uc2WwfA/gDjQjPiQEU2qY+9fqMQK 5yANEzEtVx61P5kR5USNWNV1473D2qkhdnKL03bfoCMkVRYNBoE7oxHtaX5qoMKIiP 2IiTYJ3RY0OcQ== Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:24:34 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Ratheesh Kannoth Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgoutham@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, chuck.lever@oracle.com, matttbe@kernel.org, cjubran@nvidia.com, shshitrit@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: add subbank search order control Message-ID: <20260306142434.GF461701@kernel.org> References: <20260304043032.3661647-1-rkannoth@marvell.com> <20260304043032.3661647-4-rkannoth@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260304043032.3661647-4-rkannoth@marvell.com> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:00:30AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote: > CN20K NPC MCAM is split into 32 subbanks that are searched in a > predefined order during allocation. Lower-numbered subbanks have > higher priority than higher-numbered ones. > > Add a runtime devlink parameter "srch_order" ( > DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_U32_ARRAY) to control the order in which > subbanks are searched during MCAM allocation. > > Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth > --- > drivers/base/memory.c | 1 - > .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cn20k/npc.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cn20k/npc.h | 2 + > .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c > index a3091924918b..88762061e0a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/memory.c > +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c > @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static void memory_block_release(struct device *dev) > kfree(mem); > } > > - > /* Max block size to be set by memory_block_advise_max_size */ > static unsigned long memory_block_advised_size; > static bool memory_block_advised_size_queried; Hi Ratheesh, It looks like this hunk crept into this patch by mistake. -- pw-bot: changes-requested