public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	syzbot+827ae2bfb3a3529333e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>,
	Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v1] net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock()
Date: Sat,  7 Mar 2026 11:21:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260307032158.372165-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)

Syzkaller reported a panic in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() [1].

smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() is called in the TCP receive path
(softirq) via icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock on the clcsock (TCP
listening socket). It reads sk_user_data to get the smc_sock
pointer. However, when the SMC listen socket is being closed
concurrently, smc_close_active() sets clcsock->sk_user_data
to NULL under sk_callback_lock, and then the smc_sock itself
can be freed via sock_put() in smc_release().

This leads to two issues:

1) NULL pointer dereference: sk_user_data is NULL when
   accessed.
2) Use-after-free: sk_user_data is read as non-NULL, but the
   smc_sock is freed before its fields (e.g., queued_smc_hs,
   ori_af_ops) are accessed.

The race window looks like this:

  CPU A (softirq)              CPU B (process ctx)

  tcp_v4_rcv()
    TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV:
    sk = req->rsk_listener
    sock_hold(sk)
    /* No lock on listener */
                               smc_close_active():
                                 write_lock_bh(cb_lock)
                                 sk_user_data = NULL
                                 write_unlock_bh(cb_lock)
                                 ...
                                 smc_clcsock_release()
                                 sock_put(smc->sk) x2
                                   -> smc_sock freed!
    tcp_check_req()
      smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock():
        smc = user_data(sk)
          -> NULL or dangling
        smc->queued_smc_hs
          -> crash!

Note that the clcsock and smc_sock are two independent objects
with separate refcounts. TCP stack holds a reference on the
clcsock, which keeps it alive, but this does NOT prevent the
smc_sock from being freed.

Fix this by taking sk_callback_lock to read sk_user_data and
then sock_hold(&smc->sk) under the lock to pin the smc_sock.
The lock is released immediately after sock_hold(), rather
than being held for the entire function, to avoid holding it
across ori_af_ops->syn_recv_sock() which creates child
sockets and could risk deadlocks with nested lock ordering.
sock_put(&smc->sk) is called on all exit paths after the
hold.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=827ae2bfb3a3529333e9

Fixes: 8270d9c21041 ("net/smc: Limit backlog connections")
Reported-by: syzbot+827ae2bfb3a3529333e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67eaf9b8.050a0220.3c3d88.004a.GAE@google.com/T/
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index d0119afcc6a1..21218b9b0f9a 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -131,7 +131,14 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
 	struct smc_sock *smc;
 	struct sock *child;
 
+	read_lock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock);
 	smc = smc_clcsock_user_data(sk);
+	if (!smc) {
+		read_unlock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	sock_hold(&smc->sk);
+	read_unlock_bh(&((struct sock *)sk)->sk_callback_lock);
 
 	if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) + atomic_read(&smc->queued_smc_hs) >
 				sk->sk_max_ack_backlog)
@@ -153,11 +160,13 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
 		if (inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops == inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops)
 			inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops = smc->ori_af_ops;
 	}
+	sock_put(&smc->sk);
 	return child;
 
 drop:
 	dst_release(dst);
 	tcp_listendrop(sk);
+	sock_put(&smc->sk);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-07  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-07  3:21 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-03-07  3:56 ` [PATCH net v1] net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() Eric Dumazet
2026-03-07  4:36   ` Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260307032158.372165-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=syzbot+827ae2bfb3a3529333e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox