From: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
"MD Danish Anwar" <danishanwar@ti.com>,
Vishnu Singh <v-singh1@ti.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Fix rx_filter value for PTP support
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 21:39:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310160940.109822-1-c-vankar@ti.com> (raw)
The "rx_filter" member of "hwtstamp_config" structure is an enum field and
does not support bitwise OR combination of multiple filter values. It
causes error while linuxptp application tries to match rx filter version.
Fix this by storing the requested filter type in a new port field.
Fixes: 97248adb5a3b ("net: ti: am65-cpsw: Update hw timestamping filter for PTPv1 RX packets")
Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
---
This patch is based on commit '0d9a60a0618d' of origin/main
branch of Linux net repo.
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260303075819.3246032-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
Changes from v1 to v2:
- Updated variable name to enum to avoid creating new redundant
variable as suggested by Jakub Kicinski.
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 16 +++++++++-------
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
index 967918050433..265ce5479915 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_rx_packets(struct am65_cpsw_rx_flow *flow,
ndev_priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
am65_cpsw_nuss_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb, ndev_priv->offload_fwd_mark);
skb_put(skb, pkt_len);
- if (port->rx_ts_enabled)
+ if (port->rx_ts_filter)
am65_cpts_rx_timestamp(common->cpts, skb);
skb_mark_for_recycle(skb);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
@@ -1811,11 +1811,14 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev,
switch (cfg->rx_filter) {
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE:
- port->rx_ts_enabled = false;
+ port->rx_ts_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE;
break;
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ:
+ port->rx_ts_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT;
+ cfg->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT;
+ break;
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ:
@@ -1825,8 +1828,8 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev,
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ:
- port->rx_ts_enabled = true;
- cfg->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT | HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT;
+ port->rx_ts_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT;
+ cfg->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT;
break;
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME:
@@ -1863,7 +1866,7 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev,
ts_ctrl |= AM65_CPSW_TS_TX_ANX_ALL_EN |
AM65_CPSW_PN_TS_CTL_TX_VLAN_LT1_EN;
- if (port->rx_ts_enabled)
+ if (port->rx_ts_filter)
ts_ctrl |= AM65_CPSW_TS_RX_ANX_ALL_EN |
AM65_CPSW_PN_TS_CTL_RX_VLAN_LT1_EN;
@@ -1888,8 +1891,7 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *ndev,
cfg->flags = 0;
cfg->tx_type = port->tx_ts_enabled ?
HWTSTAMP_TX_ON : HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF;
- cfg->rx_filter = port->rx_ts_enabled ? HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT |
- HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT : HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE;
+ cfg->rx_filter = port->rx_ts_filter;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
index 917c37e4e89b..7750448e4746 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct am65_cpsw_port {
bool disabled;
struct am65_cpsw_slave_data slave;
bool tx_ts_enabled;
- bool rx_ts_enabled;
+ enum hwtstamp_rx_filters rx_ts_filter;
struct am65_cpsw_qos qos;
struct devlink_port devlink_port;
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 16:09 Chintan Vankar [this message]
2026-03-12 3:50 ` [PATCH net v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Fix rx_filter value for PTP support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-03-12 10:53 ` [PATCH net v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Fix rx_filter value for PTP support: manual merge Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260310160940.109822-1-c-vankar@ti.com \
--to=c-vankar@ti.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=v-singh1@ti.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox