From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACAA317160; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773188424; cv=none; b=ZZLeLvaJUbb+Yja7EyswqMUqUVFuXkHi5ZejxJSECsAOCsdaILYtTsaPyy6/9wHZ5gzP8e1ceKlhszTcSSZaPIKUi3bqImEJXDs/AxKR6IeSDABweZsIawy0StPwqHTXlrEtf/JgqonMiu2a9WFV2cK4t7hdHRwqLi1u3OimmLo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773188424; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hjt8rYCiHadMY716FJXUReoveBi22CA9zPegPMM9eLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MVhn8bynR4BPdmYvk3ilZa5RKYKWUhbN6v0lOoWSIFSJc8/pit8xWBIM9WKLiDyyeUBsktZBSLnVO83kAHqLkddOkrClFUyzIvWJMNEObYbxwMcREWzr1oBBDQ88woHHXmv03NKyzGjgua0rs/D+aOaOUYk8kHY3h8b4qbn8WRc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dXOcsHvJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dXOcsHvJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB778C19423; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:20:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773188424; bh=hjt8rYCiHadMY716FJXUReoveBi22CA9zPegPMM9eLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dXOcsHvJ/SRFixePsDWry6p8htMTzEqDMQBY0gigUCwLpBmX1KrguGpWcFwwUY7TG NVhcFsNjzNUP2LOLnAPawoiZD6Iqh/cJJd7D+dhFjdpQ32T0fOydIMyJSUlCHRvQjO p59mLl3okKKXs36jP+jGGZ5fKsVcA6cbhAD/Kkz/qBnJaPcHsrjtxcZN71+mWSl8zb 3U7MEi591jKZeKAldDb0+ZVfCggHn+F9G/1ZAuEn/bqvM/qZHFG57xDzV1LdpiJxYY ho90ukWIlkj+39N9bzMFz2BtdKyfEI8ZTM2pBH0BQ5/SN5UBXXAwX10grdPNtVnRto YuF12W9LYxYRw== Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:20:22 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Nikola Z. Ivanov" , Dmitry Bezrukov , Igor Russkikh Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, enelsonmoore@gmail.com, kees@kernel.org, oneukum@suse.com, n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+48dc1e8dfc92faf1124c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: usb: aqc111: Do not perform PM inside runtime suspend callback Message-ID: <20260310172022.2543b368@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260306164351.503e8540@kernel.org> References: <20260304155734.110734-1-zlatistiv@gmail.com> <20260306164351.503e8540@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 16:43:51 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > The PM docs suggest that PM should not be done > > during runtime suspend, but I cannot find a > > definitive answer for system suspend, hence the > > conditional if(PMSG_IS_AUTO(message)) > > Dmitiry, Igor, could you possibly shed some light? > Can we simply switch to the _nopm() helpers instead? Hi Nikola, seems like we may not get an answer.. Let's switch to _nopm() and let people complain if this is wrong.