From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, sd@queasysnail.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_release() from tls_strp_msg_done()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:19:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311001952.57059-5-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311001952.57059-1-cel@kernel.org>
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
tls_strp_msg_done() conflates releasing the current record with
checking for the next one via tls_strp_check_rcv(). Batch
processing requires releasing a record without immediately
triggering that check, so the release step is separated into
tls_strp_msg_release(). tls_strp_msg_done() is preserved as a
wrapper for existing callers.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/tls/tls.h | 1 +
net/tls/tls_strp.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
index e8f81a006520..a97f1acef31d 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls.h
+++ b/net/tls/tls.h
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ int tls_strp_init(struct tls_strparser *strp, struct sock *sk);
void tls_strp_data_ready(struct tls_strparser *strp);
void tls_strp_check_rcv(struct tls_strparser *strp);
+void tls_strp_msg_release(struct tls_strparser *strp);
void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp);
int tls_rx_msg_size(struct tls_strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index 98e12f0ff57e..a7648ebde162 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -581,7 +581,16 @@ static void tls_strp_work(struct work_struct *w)
release_sock(strp->sk);
}
-void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
+/**
+ * tls_strp_msg_release - release the current strparser message
+ * @strp: TLS stream parser instance
+ *
+ * Release the current record without triggering a check for the
+ * next record. Callers must invoke tls_strp_check_rcv() before
+ * releasing the socket lock, or queued data will stall until
+ * the next tls_strp_data_ready() event.
+ */
+void tls_strp_msg_release(struct tls_strparser *strp)
{
WARN_ON(!strp->stm.full_len);
@@ -592,7 +601,11 @@ void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
WRITE_ONCE(strp->msg_ready, 0);
memset(&strp->stm, 0, sizeof(strp->stm));
+}
+void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
+{
+ tls_strp_msg_release(strp);
tls_strp_check_rcv(strp);
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 0:19 [PATCH v2 0/8] TLS read_sock performance scalability Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] tls: Factor tls_decrypt_async_drain() from recvmsg Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 17:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] tls: Factor tls_rx_decrypt_record() helper Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 17:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] tls: Fix dangling skb pointer in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] tls: Flush backlog before tls_rx_rec_wait in read_sock Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] tls: Restructure tls_sw_read_sock() into submit/deliver phases Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] tls: Enable batch async decryption in read_sock Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] TLS read_sock performance scalability Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260311001952.57059-5-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox