From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip_tunnel: adapt iptunnel_xmit_stats() to NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:46:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312074630.52e7a311@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311123110.1471930-1-edumazet@google.com>
On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 12:31:10 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> @syncp offset in pcpu_sw_netstats and pcpu_dstats is different.
>
> 32bit kernels would either have corruptions or freezes if the syncp
> sequence was overwritten.
And moving syncp would be too much of a hack?
> if (pkt_len > 0) {
> - struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
> -
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
> - u64_stats_add(&tstats->tx_bytes, pkt_len);
> - u64_stats_inc(&tstats->tx_packets);
> - u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
> - put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
> + if (dev->pcpu_stat_type == NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS) {
> + struct pcpu_dstats *dstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->dstats);
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&dstats->syncp);
> + u64_stats_add(&dstats->tx_bytes, pkt_len);
> + u64_stats_inc(&dstats->tx_packets);
> + u64_stats_update_end(&dstats->syncp);
> + put_cpu_ptr(dstats);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (dev->pcpu_stat_type == NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_TSTATS) {
> + struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
> + u64_stats_add(&tstats->tx_bytes, pkt_len);
> + u64_stats_inc(&tstats->tx_packets);
> + u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
> + put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
> + return;
> + }
> + pr_err_once("iptunnel_xmit_stats pcpu_stat_type=%d\n",
> + dev->pcpu_stat_type);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> return;
> }
This code can run with migration enabled? Cause dev_dstats_tx_add() etc
exist
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 12:31 [PATCH net] ip_tunnel: adapt iptunnel_xmit_stats() to NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS Eric Dumazet
2026-03-12 10:33 ` Guillaume Nault
2026-03-12 14:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-12 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-12 15:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-13 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260312074630.52e7a311@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox