public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: razor@blackwall.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:35:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312153537.GA2654271@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abBgYT5K_FI9rD1a@v4bel>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 03:18:09AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called
> on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in
> softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule
> ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> returning and kfree_rcu() being called.
> 
> The following is a simple race scenario:
> 
>            cpu0                                     cpu1
> 
> mep_delete_implementation()
>   cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork);
>                                            br_cfm_frame_rx()
>                                              // peer_mep still in hlist
>                                              if (peer_mep->ccm_defect)
>                                                ccm_rx_timer_start()
>                                                  queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork)
>   hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head);
>   kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu);
>                                            ccm_rx_work_expired()
>                                              // on freed peer_mep
> 
> To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with
> disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so
> that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx()
> are silently rejected.
> 
> The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where
> the work must remain re-schedulable.
> 
> Fixes: dc32cbb3dbd7 ("bridge: cfm: Kernel space implementation of CFM. CCM frame RX added.")
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>

Not familiar with CFM, but your explanation makes sense.

AFAICT it's not needed for ccm_tx_dwork since the delayed work re-queues
itself.

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 18:18 [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-11  3:02 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-12 15:35 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-03-13  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260312153537.GA2654271@shredder \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox