From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: razor@blackwall.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:35:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312153537.GA2654271@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abBgYT5K_FI9rD1a@v4bel>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 03:18:09AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called
> on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in
> softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule
> ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> returning and kfree_rcu() being called.
>
> The following is a simple race scenario:
>
> cpu0 cpu1
>
> mep_delete_implementation()
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork);
> br_cfm_frame_rx()
> // peer_mep still in hlist
> if (peer_mep->ccm_defect)
> ccm_rx_timer_start()
> queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork)
> hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head);
> kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu);
> ccm_rx_work_expired()
> // on freed peer_mep
>
> To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with
> disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so
> that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx()
> are silently rejected.
>
> The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where
> the work must remain re-schedulable.
>
> Fixes: dc32cbb3dbd7 ("bridge: cfm: Kernel space implementation of CFM. CCM frame RX added.")
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Not familiar with CFM, but your explanation makes sense.
AFAICT it's not needed for ccm_tx_dwork since the delayed work re-queues
itself.
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 18:18 [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-11 3:02 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-12 15:35 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-03-13 1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260312153537.GA2654271@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox