From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
leiyang@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jon@nutanix.com,
tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 06:35:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313063350-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a12fd0e3-40e9-4da7-9bdb-ae5d30e118b8@tu-dortmund.de>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:49:53AM +0100, Simon Schippers wrote:
> On 3/12/26 14:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Simon Schippers wrote:
> >> This patch series deals with tun/tap & vhost-net which drop incoming
> >> SKBs whenever their internal ptr_ring buffer is full. Instead, with this
> >> patch series, the associated netdev queue is stopped - but only when a
> >> qdisc is attached. If no qdisc is present the existing behavior is
> >> preserved. This patch series touches tun/tap and vhost-net, as they
> >> share common logic and must be updated together. Modifying only one of
> >> them would break the other.
> >>
> >> By applying proper backpressure, this change allows the connected qdisc to
> >> operate correctly, as reported in [1], and significantly improves
> >> performance in real-world scenarios, as demonstrated in our paper [2]. For
> >> example, we observed a 36% TCP throughput improvement for an OpenVPN
> >> connection between Germany and the USA.
> >>
> >> Synthetic pktgen benchmarks indicate a slight regression.
> >> Pktgen benchmarks are provided per commit, with the final commit showing
> >> the overall performance.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > I posted a minor nit on patch 2.
> >
> > Otherwise LGTM:
> >
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >
> > thanks for the work!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Should I do a new version for the minor nit?
It's easier if you do, yes.
> And how about the ptr_ring race:
> I see there is a seperate discussion for that now. [1]
> Should I wait for that?
If there's a conflict it will be trivial to resolve, so I'd say no.
> Before sending a potential new version I would of course wait for
> Jason's take.
>
> [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iJLC9p+N=Rqtuj7ZuPRdpSGCATCtZdz1Vi9mbzf3ATekQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> >
> >
> >> [1] Link: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/762935/traffic-shaping-ineffective-on-tun-device
> >> [2] Link: https://cni.etit.tu-dortmund.de/storages/cni-etit/r/Research/Publications/2025/Gebauer_2025_VTCFall/Gebauer_VTCFall2025_AuthorsVersion.pdf
> >> [3] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/174549940981.608169.4363875844729313831.stgit@firesoul
> >> [4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/176295323282.307447.14790015927673763094.stgit@firesoul
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changelog:
> >> V8:
> >> - Drop code changes in drivers/net/tap.c; The code there deals with
> >> ipvtap/macvtap which are unrelated to the goal of this patch series
> >> and I did not realize that before
> >> -> Greatly simplified logic, 4 instead of 9 commits
> >> -> No more duplicated logics and distinction in vhost required
> >> - Only wake after the queue stopped and half of the ring was consumed
> >> as suggested by MST
> >> -> Performance improvements for TAP, but still slightly slower
> >> - Better benchmarking with pinned threads, XDP drop program for
> >> tap+vhost-net and disabling CPU mitigations (and newer Ryzen 5 5600X
> >> processor) as suggested by Jason Wang
> >>
> >> V7: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260107210448.37851-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/
> >> - Switch to an approach similar to veth [3] (excluding the recently fixed
> >> variant [4]), as suggested by MST, with minor adjustments discussed in V6
> >> - Rename the cover-letter title
> >> - Add multithreaded pktgen and iperf3 benchmarks, as suggested by Jason
> >> Wang
> >> - Rework __ptr_ring_consume_created_space() so it can also be used after
> >> batched consume
> >>
> >> V6: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251120152914.1127975-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/
> >> General:
> >> - Major adjustments to the descriptions. Special thanks to Jon Kohler!
> >> - Fix git bisect by moving most logic into dedicated functions and only
> >> start using them in patch 7.
> >> - Moved the main logic of the coupled producer and consumer into a single
> >> patch to avoid a chicken-and-egg dependency between commits :-)
> >> - Rebased to 6.18-rc5 and ran benchmarks again that now also include lost
> >> packets (previously I missed a 0, so all benchmark results were higher by
> >> factor 10...).
> >> - Also include the benchmark in patch 7.
> >>
> >> Producer:
> >> - Move logic into the new helper tun_ring_produce()
> >> - Added a smp_rmb() paired with the consumer, ensuring freed space of the
> >> consumer is visible
> >> - Assume that ptr_ring is not full when __ptr_ring_full_next() is called
> >>
> >> Consumer:
> >> - Use an unpaired smp_rmb() instead of barrier() to ensure that the
> >> netdev_tx_queue_stopped() call completes before discarding
> >> - Also wake the netdev queue if it was stopped before discarding and then
> >> becomes empty
> >> -> Fixes race with producer as identified by MST in V5
> >> -> Waking the netdev queues upon resize is not required anymore
> >> - Use __ptr_ring_consume_created_space() instead of messing with ptr_ring
> >> internals
> >> -> Batched consume now just calls
> >> __tun_ring_consume()/__tap_ring_consume() in a loop
> >> - Added an smp_wmb() before waking the netdev queue which is paired with
> >> the smp_rmb() discussed above
> >>
> >> V5: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250922221553.47802-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/T/#u
> >> - Stop the netdev queue prior to producing the final fitting ptr_ring entry
> >> -> Ensures the consumer has the latest netdev queue state, making it safe
> >> to wake the queue
> >> -> Resolves an issue in vhost-net where the netdev queue could remain
> >> stopped despite being empty
> >> -> For TUN/TAP, the netdev queue no longer needs to be woken in the
> >> blocking loop
> >> -> Introduces new helpers __ptr_ring_full_next and
> >> __ptr_ring_will_invalidate for this purpose
> >> - vhost-net now uses wrappers of TUN/TAP for ptr_ring consumption rather
> >> than maintaining its own rx_ring pointer
> >>
> >> V4: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250902080957.47265-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/T/#u
> >> - Target net-next instead of net
> >> - Changed to patch series instead of single patch
> >> - Changed to new title from old title
> >> "TUN/TAP: Improving throughput and latency by avoiding SKB drops"
> >> - Wake netdev queue with new helpers wake_netdev_queue when there is any
> >> spare capacity in the ptr_ring instead of waiting for it to be empty
> >> - Use tun_file instead of tun_struct in tun_ring_recv as a more consistent
> >> logic
> >> - Use smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() barrier pair, which avoids any packet drops
> >> that happened rarely before
> >> - Use safer logic for vhost-net using RCU read locks to access TUN/TAP data
> >>
> >> V3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250825211832.84901-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/T/#u
> >> - Added support for TAP and TAP+vhost-net.
> >>
> >> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250811220430.14063-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/T/#u
> >> - Removed NETDEV_TX_BUSY return case in tun_net_xmit and removed
> >> unnecessary netif_tx_wake_queue in tun_ring_recv.
> >>
> >> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250808153721.261334-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de/T/#u
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Simon Schippers (4):
> >> tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup
> >> vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume
> >> ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper
> >> tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present
> >>
> >> drivers/net/tun.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 +++++--
> >> include/linux/if_tun.h | 3 ++
> >> include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 14 ++++++-
> >> 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 13:06 [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Simon Schippers
2026-03-12 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/4] tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup Simon Schippers
2026-03-24 1:47 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-12 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/4] vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume Simon Schippers
2026-03-12 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-24 1:47 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-12 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/4] ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper Simon Schippers
2026-03-12 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-12 13:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-12 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-25 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-12 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present Simon Schippers
2026-03-24 1:47 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-24 10:14 ` Simon Schippers
2026-03-25 14:47 ` Simon Schippers
2026-03-26 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-26 15:30 ` Simon Schippers
2026-03-12 13:55 ` [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-13 9:49 ` Simon Schippers
2026-03-13 10:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-03-23 21:49 ` Simon Schippers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313063350-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox