From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B361A9FAF; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773690069; cv=none; b=iiPbCehsUJTikfMM022U0njNo/SF22o3AAfyEv3IqbThRiMG9m1yZGe1SybhUudOtdSumCZzGT1yvBS6IcfhqszL+svX8aYNDmr1u3Ghlo4TbSTfXHBhl2nsTk63Fj+w2m9fCh2BAuVmtBkGQ4y97/nulL2i1ye/fcCUoNq0raw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773690069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+r/rKSDJHKoEyUKWlrdPrbGCuVC2E2OzQyf0nGl0zCc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vBKbY1tMzHPzVY5+YicK3GjTE4RqVB/PWI0kvmOdbpI1VzqRJ0Yk4wzcQbKQTuS/rnvWShWZTaLDmw9rkJNJZYpntx1V60MAQd2L3GoHunrjSRXe9zZdx6A203lTqQOvI9HjhhPZnvW9fmIdkHFMbsIWeVTojR53hq/hHRWbrBg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=t6gf85r8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="t6gf85r8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FBBCC19421; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:41:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773690069; bh=+r/rKSDJHKoEyUKWlrdPrbGCuVC2E2OzQyf0nGl0zCc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t6gf85r8cnydejSet9c0sttbHQI2BMNRJUEL4LM4qSqlCJPzzGrYam2YVn67iGS6l UsQQkMIXKR/3xG0sCF3Wxa4rzDUn8mCMroPEAiHofQNkMgtxKsvXC5lI6kVEmpsmnA qSraGb/SPn2C47x4f/prj3MqR7r6mTTJFdCNdgPhrjnCRGyyOSKsN/UJFO60tGmw3b 9qcfktfmvpFSoaPZl/ufmkfdQYL2LDdO7qV7v7psaivdxOReDjwVRD+NozCIzeAzPa Pf5gxG1Aq5ju6cAFsij9yibQ2GqLAQM7cFvAxE+zIwfMaj7Y8qQYql8y4xa9qf/MJW Qoo16doqzV/Tg== Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:41:07 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tony Nguyen Cc: Przemek Kitszel , , , , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , "Paolo Abeni" Subject: Re: [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Message-ID: <20260316124107.0dd3cc2b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <878cd07a-b7fb-491a-9cec-8ddbab2bb13b@intel.com> References: <20260313150917.271086-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> <0ca7f92b-ec4e-469c-ad2b-648d278bcfe9@intel.com> <20260314091048.235a6d0b@kernel.org> <878cd07a-b7fb-491a-9cec-8ddbab2bb13b@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:58:29 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote: > On 3/14/2026 9:10 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel > > > > Process question - even tho you are also a maintainer I only read > > Tony's tags as "please apply directly". LMK if that's right, I'll > > try to remember / make a note.. > > I talked to Przemek about this a little this morning. Since the > Reviewed-by tag is used more prevalently in our process, perhaps an > Acked-by could mean take this directly and the Reviewed-by keeps the > same process of going through IWL. Other thought would be to explicitly > ask/state for it to get taken directly. Open to other ideas as well if > there's something else you'd prefer. Sounds complicated :S Let me continue ignoring Przemek's tags for the purpose of direct application. I guess it's more about who sends the PRs than who is a maintainer. If you send PRs I naturally never see your review tags, as the patches will eventually come out with your SoB.