From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653C726AF4; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773798723; cv=none; b=XXzI9qiD4n4zrVXK0+XMc+t+++DxAk7Wz4DxxgBkUJqnfG30wWa9g8wn+i7gnG7hJD8/HkduMnAV9u9RklDDVWKIogRyr6UzUVcwcJxyQ2oHt/JBFjV4+t+Qn3XcwUvgLzDP3Uc7uJwDrP+pG+6XbEL7BI0L7LZiB50fRfwuMvg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773798723; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J4/FZpxdsxGLgWctP7/JS4Mcu4RszMThWMIJvsQo1rM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QtMwn6o1u9lBY0rqMHNzyseuKrTTA1i1kHHUnz7LNczHJ1yuLLBIMiWG1fNFlQ1Ag06F0D2OEtWFGps7kY5sVi2akxZFLwPPCFyKD9mkTMTiHA88jY8DxKMmqo7O/VFqgIFU0ku2qyy0py6RAOU0lTNYyOBQRoeTnOJHgU08s/A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bViFVAJ/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bViFVAJ/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A9EAC4CEF7; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:52:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773798723; bh=J4/FZpxdsxGLgWctP7/JS4Mcu4RszMThWMIJvsQo1rM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bViFVAJ/gYQhaFmfJwm5GMWHSuuOq1nCPPjp6/q/zNveCp5NDDyBUX/xLBZeFyDSU CyDTL8gyGrBKr1vi4dFmWQjCd9mpFjVMwZhNIj7yjKmPjNbCSg4ClH342v1+YVvwQf Qo6agY2S73lWaFYD+erg+t7qteAoeyVze01rfy8WTGCoE5wchmf1JwHaF0etTFDIOw MLv9riNNFPPzvtcD+n1tbxDVN9nq1MN3zFy9DekXD/3y6tuUbZX4IaZpCUj5Cgyv+K z+uWyGHb0+uNrn4oUhxxWL23nKVecvbuRGATpme1njF0t06PsrikFaZ9S+tU+D09R8 aOU46ly5xNceQ== Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:52:01 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Maciej Fijalkowski , bpf , Network Development , "Karlsson, Magnus" , Stanislav Fomichev , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] xsk: use __xsk_rcv_zc_safe for ZC multi-buffer Rx processing Message-ID: <20260317185201.40585c7b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260316140557.461288-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> <20260316171200.4b8a96a0@kernel.org> <20260317152045.58c719a7@kernel.org> <20260317182920.3f4fd8eb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:43:18 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > I wasn't paying attention. We can revert it in bpf-next and reapply > > > in net-next and probably route all future xsk patches to net/net-next ? > > > since it doesn't have much to do with bpf anymore. > > > > Maybe we should defer until the merge window and let it sit in Maciej's > > local tree for now. It's a tiny optimization, Maciej can resend in the > > next cycle. > > or I can apply it to bpf-next/master and we start taking xsk via net-next > after merge window? SGTM