public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Nora Schiffer <nora.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
	Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@ew.tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Add ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss compatible
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:35:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318-sustained-reshuffle-eaf180729a9c@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382fed198246f1563dea091478757aebc4e4948.1773751309.git.nora.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1294 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Nora Schiffer wrote:
> The J722S CPSW3G is mostly identical to the AM64's, but additionally
> supports SGMII.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nora Schiffer <nora.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> index a959c1d7e643a..9ab8237c7f79e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ properties:
>        - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
>        - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
>        - ti,j721e-cpswxg-nuss
> +      - ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss

For all these bindings, why is a fallback not suitable? Seems like it'd
be possible here, since there's just a new feature. Is there some other
programming model difference?

>        - ti,j784s4-cpswxg-nuss
>  
>    reg:
> -- 
> TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> https://www.tq-group.com/
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 14:05 [PATCH 0/7] J722S SGMII support Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: ti: phy-j721e-wiz: Add ti,j722s-wiz-10g compatible Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: phy: ti: phy-gmii-sel: Add ti,j722s-phy-gmii-sel compatible Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Add ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss compatible Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 17:35   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-03-19  8:55     ` Nora Schiffer
2026-03-19 14:37       ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] phy: ti: phy-j721e-wiz: add support for J722S SoC family Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] phy: ti: gmii-sel: " Nora Schiffer
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: " Nora Schiffer
2026-03-19  8:52   ` Nora Schiffer
2026-03-20 14:23   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-20 19:06   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-18 14:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s-main: use J722S compatible strings for SGMII support Nora Schiffer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260318-sustained-reshuffle-eaf180729a9c@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=nora.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox