public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: wei.fang@nxp.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	robh@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	frank.li@nxp.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, kuba@kernel.org, chleroy@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,12/14] net: dsa: netc: add more basic functions support
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:49:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318144954.1893193-3-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316094152.1558671-13-wei.fang@nxp.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: dsa: netc: add more basic functions support

This patch expands the NETC switch driver with several foundational
features, including FDB and MDB management, STP state handling, MTU
configuration, port setup/teardown, and host flooding support.
At this stage, the driver operates only in standalone port mode.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c
> index 884ee899fc89..fd952b507cbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -427,24 +658,57 @@ static int netc_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto free_mdio_bus;
>
> +	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&priv->fdb_list);
> +	mutex_init(&priv->fdbt_lock);
> +
>  	netc_switch_fixed_config(priv);
>
>  	/* default setting for ports */
>  	dsa_switch_for_each_available_port(dp, ds)
>  		netc_port_default_config(priv->ports[dp->index]);
>
> +	err = netc_add_standalone_vlan_entry(priv);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto free_ntmp_user;
> +
> +	err = netc_add_standalone_fdb_bcast_entry(priv);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto free_ntmp_user;
> +
>  	return 0;
>
> +free_ntmp_user:
> +	netc_free_ntmp_user(priv);
>  free_mdio_bus:
>  	netc_free_mdio_bus(priv);
>
>  	return err;
>  }

Does the error path handle the mutex properly?

In netc_setup(), the mutex is initialized with mutex_init(&priv->fdbt_lock).
If netc_add_standalone_vlan_entry() or netc_add_standalone_fdb_bcast_entry()
fails, the error path jumps to free_ntmp_user:

drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c:netc_setup() {
	...
	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&priv->fdb_list);
	mutex_init(&priv->fdbt_lock);
	...
	err = netc_add_standalone_vlan_entry(priv);
	if (err)
		goto free_ntmp_user;

	err = netc_add_standalone_fdb_bcast_entry(priv);
	if (err)
		goto free_ntmp_user;

	return 0;

free_ntmp_user:
	netc_free_ntmp_user(priv);
free_mdio_bus:
	netc_free_mdio_bus(priv);

	return err;
}

But netc_free_ntmp_user() and netc_free_mdio_bus() don't call
mutex_destroy(&priv->fdbt_lock) to clean up the mutex.

Looking at the normal teardown path in netc_teardown(), it calls
netc_destroy_all_lists() which properly handles both the FDB list and
mutex cleanup:

drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c:netc_destroy_all_lists() {
	netc_destroy_fdb_list(priv);
	mutex_destroy(&priv->fdbt_lock);
}

drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c:netc_teardown() {
	struct netc_switch *priv = ds->priv;

	netc_destroy_all_lists(priv);
	netc_free_host_flood_rules(priv);
	netc_free_ntmp_user(priv);
	netc_free_mdio_bus(priv);
}

Should the error path in netc_setup() call netc_destroy_all_lists() before
calling netc_free_ntmp_user()?

> @@ -595,6 +859,261 @@ static void netc_switch_get_ip_revision(struct netc_switch *priv)
>  	priv->revision = val & IPBRR0_IP_REV;
>  }
>
> +static void netc_destroy_all_lists(struct netc_switch *priv)
> +{
> +	netc_destroy_fdb_list(priv);
> +	mutex_destroy(&priv->fdbt_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void netc_free_host_flood_rules(struct netc_switch *priv)
> +{
> +	struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> +	dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(dp, priv->ds) {
> +		struct netc_port *np = priv->ports[dp->index];
> +
> +		kfree(np->host_flood);
> +		np->host_flood = NULL;
> +	}
> +}

[Simon says: I think this is a false positive and the clean-up
 suggestion is not needed in tear down]

Does this properly clean up the hardware state?

netc_free_host_flood_rules() just frees the host_flood memory and sets
the pointer to NULL:

drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c:netc_free_host_flood_rules() {
	struct dsa_port *dp;

	dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(dp, priv->ds) {
		struct netc_port *np = priv->ports[dp->index];

		kfree(np->host_flood);
		np->host_flood = NULL;
	}
}

But it doesn't delete the hardware IPFT entry or disable the PIPFCR register.

Compare with netc_port_remove_host_flood() which performs complete cleanup:

drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c:netc_port_remove_host_flood() {
	struct netc_switch *priv = np->switch_priv;

	if (!np->host_flood)
		return;

	ntmp_ipft_delete_entry(&priv->ntmp, np->host_flood->entry_id);
	kfree(np->host_flood);
	np->host_flood = NULL;
	np->uc = false;
	np->mc = false;
	/* Disable ingress port filter table lookup */
	netc_port_wr(np, NETC_PIPFCR, 0);
}

In netc_teardown(), netc_free_host_flood_rules() is called before
netc_free_ntmp_user(), so the NTMP command infrastructure is still
operational at that point.

Should netc_free_host_flood_rules() call netc_port_remove_host_flood(np)
for each user port instead of directly calling kfree()?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16  9:41 [PATCH net-next 00/14] Add preliminary NETC switch support for i.MX94 Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: update the description of 'dsa,member' property Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: add NETC switch Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] net: enetc: add pre-boot initialization for i.MX94 switch Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] net: enetc: add basic operations to the FDB table Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] net: enetc: add support for the "Add" operation to VLAN filter table Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] net: enetc: add support for the "Update" operation to buffer pool table Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] net: enetc: add support for "Add" and "Delete" operations to IPFT Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] net: enetc: add multiple command BD rings support Wei Fang
2026-03-18 14:32   ` [net-next,08/14] " Simon Horman
2026-03-19  2:15     ` Wei Fang
2026-03-18 22:41   ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] " Frank Li
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] net: dsa: add NETC switch tag support Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] net: dsa: netc: introduce NXP NETC switch driver for i.MX94 Wei Fang
2026-03-18 14:39   ` [net-next,10/14] " Simon Horman
2026-03-19  2:48     ` Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] net: dsa: netc: add phylink MAC operations Wei Fang
2026-03-18 14:46   ` [net-next,11/14] " Simon Horman
2026-03-19  2:01     ` Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] net: dsa: netc: add more basic functions support Wei Fang
2026-03-18 14:49   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-03-19  2:59     ` [net-next,12/14] " Wei Fang
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] net: dsa: netc: initialize buffer bool table and implement flow-control Wei Fang
2026-03-18 14:54   ` [net-next,13/14] " Simon Horman
2026-03-18 14:56     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-18 22:24       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 15:00         ` Simon Horman
2026-03-19 14:59       ` Simon Horman
2026-03-16  9:41 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] net: dsa: netc: add support for the standardized counters Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260318144954.1893193-3-horms@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox