From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800D52D4B40; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773931054; cv=none; b=VIlxOq5A9PsWyVnHLxbFgXyPbkHYEAqbIFZqe3Q5yccd5EFPLyS+u00/s51zMgWBvhLe1W+brtN2skQg0JMy4mZUJmkFOy3lJYpEb/g0Mg2AFlXdEcLrEA7v8sDXUfD8pJmruQ8dfY2zFOfRn0DI4kQ7crjkgxFFCvaJElS87SM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773931054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KLDhtxsHsK8rztqKAtAqMROmIfFr0P5kwaXY6DoAmsY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cbLrG/UpC3alPPj+5IHAnqZqB+RHJwW23mC5yfK/Mukv/Uj+LbDGOPVKnm4vNyO9h9+EGE9zAqOW5mK9qOwttTXSLpP1UTBlyEiNr1PajKu68L39/IgrZGUxfj0k8Go4DUxpjcUXInW3CdB57Ov/6f9IAkQvCXeGg8SgK6vYU3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NpRLQu8l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NpRLQu8l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46C01C19424; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:37:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773931054; bh=KLDhtxsHsK8rztqKAtAqMROmIfFr0P5kwaXY6DoAmsY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NpRLQu8lLh5mgVxrGIq5qNOsH7ANyRHYIRnYo1YmESCVUnnBBcCR9Mi0p/tf7XxNs D3LrNInZhWa7j6aLAOqDUqy0HseKeaXPXOASXsuDPisTzcxtZyofvkZHNUWZgfkSvJ PBh23kpF9RDHhRtqv+t4kHkCH7sOtzU4U8dPesWJWHlu66+UjWwAOwYlDz2SHhmI4S qGeKyjJhfMUqpfghEcpQ/qzz3vZFdle7At8qkf9LFCZKRxheQamD6zFkIBD8VViVi1 seG/T87aAQWxehb6O3OfoFmaRSvuGiPYGphZd3+5wjxai0kBgrTp7Qe8TiKzmHQU2m YRZN1lMY069Lw== Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:37:27 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Nora Schiffer Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Siddharth Vadapalli , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vinod Koul , Neil Armstrong , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@ew.tq-group.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Add ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss compatible Message-ID: <20260319-embroider-cloud-0f8b7ea975eb@spud> References: <1382fed198246f1563dea091478757aebc4e4948.1773751309.git.nora.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com> <20260318-sustained-reshuffle-eaf180729a9c@spud> <37396c094c7124169ca376cf6aea5350971aec54.camel@ew.tq-group.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xd7J1FUbMSfddi+G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37396c094c7124169ca376cf6aea5350971aec54.camel@ew.tq-group.com> --xd7J1FUbMSfddi+G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 09:55:24AM +0100, Nora Schiffer wrote: > On Wed, 2026-03-18 at 17:35 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Nora Schiffer wrote: > > > The J722S CPSW3G is mostly identical to the AM64's, but additionally > > > supports SGMII. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Nora Schiffer > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml | 1= + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > >=20 > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-n= uss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml > > > index a959c1d7e643a..9ab8237c7f79e 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml > > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ properties: > > > - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss > > > - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss > > > - ti,j721e-cpswxg-nuss > > > + - ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss > >=20 > > For all these bindings, why is a fallback not suitable? Seems like it'd > > be possible here, since there's just a new feature. Is there some other > > programming model difference? >=20 > I think a fallback makes sense, I didn't add one because other variants d= erived > from the AM64 don't have one either. I can include a fallback in v2 (for = all 3 > bindings in this series). Unless someones got a good reason not to, I think you should do so. --xd7J1FUbMSfddi+G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCabwKJwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0mZPAQDOmTS3hQH1+4EWz3iVgYp6/DejsN7lwqlJyuo0AsAX4AEApNRPLGqBM0jO szx8cd91ntJY8h7pt4Fw5f8sH3YbFA8= =r2h7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xd7J1FUbMSfddi+G--