From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3E9382291; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773949276; cv=none; b=Dc7A4JoytHhQe5/q2dzA6O73fZAHWgHXdgXYyxtvE1fvkvGciCSAjZN5uhEItPXikfD7zKOyAZ9LdV+uoWLmgAlUX2q3j7eE7NG1bm447Jqpw6tbDqfN3pRI9Jf+WiOXGI5a6vJMljeFPBTi5WzN5jDmVhH18ILArMSobTtaxtU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773949276; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TdlVJRwwkwahwEi8GZmgOPq7txdAgkP9t4ENRmXm/X0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mk4ofEkRlHyQJmFEAIhD/8XEZSDhFFUOfutHe25haZP/sViB6yDkR0KU1WD5wZTvNspEwcFiqUTUFl0kGUTqu1OZc/Jvz4HIodWlswBknjXCaHJuNp5T/CNZyx+I53P5EFtgdVLd8/2gcsqxGpZ+yWkK6L8a5QR7qRpU8NojjH0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Yb9XlwQ5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Yb9XlwQ5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA4ABC19424; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:41:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773949276; bh=TdlVJRwwkwahwEi8GZmgOPq7txdAgkP9t4ENRmXm/X0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Yb9XlwQ5MNFqWqNL1DThNRuKpTqi6R9x3HGXLZztGXb4FgXi3fePOIJtLhLKDmrm5 Kq4F6djmSPlN6Ss2IO0ZTgPkjLH/A0XXp095FYQPD5aErjCXnls2XvZunvpQeZyMQH OSDvjmSxDn3URptf3RVB+0vF0bSiG1uo6OZ5QVW56Vag/ILZy0YjmKFo9Eu5FgprgG 2HN8gCqpl6YC4nZngYG9PYfxQSlIDV2maBw41Ob3sv2wvpBjg2U2Fm0cywFMe5Pqkc B5KYUaPS3k/JH7ISYp0oAFpS4NX+CLZ1AgRb7FCMzkxV8xgYNVgqRQrvmtZiiL+C9c MltmNSvx7OIrg== Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:41:14 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ralf@mandelbit.com, Sabrina Dubroca , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] selftests: ovpn: add test for the FW mark feature Message-ID: <20260319124114.42f91f72@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260317104023.192548-9-antonio@openvpn.net> References: <20260317104023.192548-1-antonio@openvpn.net> <20260317104023.192548-9-antonio@openvpn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:40:22 +0100 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > From: Ralf Lici > > Add a selftest to verify that the FW mark socket option is correctly > supported and its value propagated by ovpn. > > The test adds and removes nftables DROP rules based on the mark value, > and checks that the rule counter aligns with the number of lost ping > packets. Hi! Now that the other fixes are in tree we can stop ignoring ovpn tests :) This new mark test is failing, looks like netfilter is not enabled. All CONFIG options you depend on which are not in defconfig should be listed in tools/testing/selftests/net/ovpn/config Our CI currently builds this config for ovpn tests: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/net-extra/results/565721/config Please add to tools/testing/selftests/net/ovpn/config what this test needs.