public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	horms@kernel.org, alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	marc.dionne@auristor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@1seal.org, stable@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	anderson@allelesecurity.com, jaltman@auristor.com,
	edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] rxrpc: Fix use of wrong skb when comparing queued RESP challenge serial
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:45:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260321014543.3892478-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319150150.4189381-3-dhowells@redhat.com>

Hi David!

The review under --- is AI generated. It looks legit to me.

The Google reviewer also points out preexiting problems that may be worth looking at:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319150150.4189381-1-dhowells%40redhat.com

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
rxrpc: Fix use of wrong skb when comparing queued RESP challenge serial

In rxrpc_post_response(), the code should be comparing the challenge
serial number from the cached response before deciding to switch to a
newer response, but looks at the newer packet private data instead,
rendering the comparison always false.

Fix this by switching to look at the older packet.

> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 98ad9b51ca2c..2c27f47951f9 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ void rxrpc_post_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	spin_lock_irq(&local->lock);
>  	old = conn->tx_response;
>  	if (old) {
> -		struct rxrpc_skb_priv *osp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
> +		struct rxrpc_skb_priv *osp = rxrpc_skb(old);
>
>  		/* Always go with the response to the most recent challenge. */
>  		if (after(sp->resp.challenge_serial, osp->resp.challenge_serial))
>  			conn->tx_response = old;
                        ^^^^
Does this have the logic inverted? The comment says "Always go with
the response to the most recent challenge" and the condition checks
if the new response has a more recent serial number:

    if (after(sp->resp.challenge_serial, osp->resp.challenge_serial))

When this is TRUE (new serial is after old serial), the code keeps
the OLD response by setting conn->tx_response = old. Shouldn't it
keep the NEW response instead? Something like:

    if (after(sp->resp.challenge_serial, osp->resp.challenge_serial))
        conn->tx_response = skb;

This would cause the connection to respond to outdated challenges
rather than the most recent one.

>  		else
>  			old = skb;

When a new response is rejected here (because the old response has a
more recent challenge serial), what happens to the rejected packet?
The function assigns it to the local variable 'old' but never frees
it.

Looking at the callers:
- rxkad_respond_to_challenge() in rxkad.c sets response = NULL after
  calling this function
- rxgk_construct_response() in rxgk.c does the same

This suggests ownership transfers to rxrpc_post_response(). Should
the rejected packet be freed with rxrpc_free_skb() before returning?

>  	} else {
>  		conn->tx_response = skb;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&local->lock);
>  	rxrpc_poke_conn(conn, rxrpc_conn_get_poke_response);
>  }
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19 15:01 [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-03-19 15:01 ` [PATCH net 1/5] rxrpc: Fix RxGK token loading to check bounds David Howells
2026-03-19 15:01 ` [PATCH net 2/5] rxrpc: Fix use of wrong skb when comparing queued RESP challenge serial David Howells
2026-03-21  1:45   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-21  8:15     ` David Howells
2026-03-23 21:45       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 21:51         ` David Howells
2026-03-23 22:11           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 15:01 ` [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Fix rack timer warning to report unexpected mode David Howells
2026-03-19 15:01 ` [PATCH net 4/5] rxrpc: Fix keyring reference count leak in rxrpc_setsockopt() David Howells
2026-03-19 15:01 ` [PATCH net 5/5] rxrpc: Fix key reference count leak from call->key David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260321014543.3892478-2-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
    --cc=anderson@allelesecurity.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=security@1seal.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox