public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: xw x <v3rdant.xiang@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>,
	jakub@cloudflare.com, sd@queasysnail.net, davem@davemloft.net,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tls: reject attaching TLS to sockets already in sockmap
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:41:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260321074155.6fdb79dc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFFJMPyDpKwW9O127JkS1B3bgGGzWPpiw5MqFEbGB6Qpq0nsVQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 17:47:07 +0800 xw x wrote:
> I apologize. I fixed it this way because during my exploitation, I
> discovered that sk_psock_init checks for the existence of ULP in sk,
> which led me to believe that disabling sk with TLS from being added to
> sockmap was expected behavior, and I thought this fix might have the
> least impact.
> 
> In fact, the other patch which I believe is a more fundamental
> solution, is similar to CVE-2025-37756. In
> `tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue`,
> `skb_shinfo(strp->anchor)->frag_list = first` acquires a reference to
> an skb but doesn't own it. This causes a  dangling pointer when other
> kernel components not specifically adapted to TLS (tcp_disconnect in
> CVE-2025-37756 and bpt in that vuln) release TLS skbs.
> 
> I will try to add my test program to
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_ktls.c so that you can
> test it and understand the root cause.

FWIW you can open a pull request against this repo, and it will run all
the sockmap+TLS tests for you: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf

reminder: please don't top post on the list

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-21  3:30 [PATCH] tls: reject attaching TLS to sockets already in sockmap Xingwang Xiang
2026-03-21  9:01 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-21  9:47   ` xw x
2026-03-21 14:41     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260321074155.6fdb79dc@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=mrpre@163.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=v3rdant.xiang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox