public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/5] nfsd/lockd: Remove redundant debug checks
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 22:15:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260321141510.68214-3-seanwascoding@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260321141510.68214-1-seanwascoding@gmail.com>

Remove unnecessary IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG) guards and #ifdefs
in nfsfh.c and svclock.c.

Verification with .lst files under -O2 confirms that the compiler
successfully performs "dead code elimination". Even when variables
(like char buf[] in nfsfh.c) or static helper functions (like
nlmdbg_cookie2a() in svclock.c) are declared without #ifdef, they are
completely optimized out (no stack allocation, no symbol references in
the final executable) as they are only referenced within no_printk().

Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
---
 fs/lockd/svclock.c | 7 -------
 fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c    | 8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index ee23f5802af1..9b978a087b3c 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nlmsvc_grant_ops;
 static LIST_HEAD(nlm_blocked);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nlm_blocked_lock);
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
 static const char *nlmdbg_cookie2a(const struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
 {
 	/*
@@ -74,12 +73,6 @@ static const char *nlmdbg_cookie2a(const struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
 
 	return buf;
 }
-#else
-static inline const char *nlmdbg_cookie2a(const struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
-{
-	return "???";
-}
-#endif
 
 /*
  * Insert a blocked lock into the global list
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
index 68b629fbaaeb..91514326d1b4 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
@@ -105,12 +105,10 @@ static __be32 nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
 {
 	/* Check if the request originated from a secure port. */
 	if (rqstp && !nfsd_originating_port_ok(rqstp, cred, exp)) {
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)) {
-			char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
+		char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
 
-			dprintk("nfsd: request from insecure port %s!\n",
-			        svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
-		}
+		dprintk("nfsd: request from insecure port %s!\n",
+			svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
 		return nfserr_perm;
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-21 14:15 [PATCH v5 0/5] sunrpc/nfs: cleanup redundant debug checks and refactor macros Sean Chang
2026-03-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sunrpc: Fix dprintk type mismatch using do-while(0) Sean Chang
2026-03-21 16:37   ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-25 15:49     ` Sean Chang
2026-03-21 14:15 ` Sean Chang [this message]
2026-03-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] svcrdma: Remove redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG) guards Sean Chang
2026-03-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] nfs: Refactor nfs_errorf macros and remove unused ones Sean Chang
2026-03-21 16:38   ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-25 16:11     ` Sean Chang
2026-03-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] Revert "nfsd: Mark variable __maybe_unused to avoid W=1 build break" Sean Chang
2026-03-21 16:38   ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-25 16:39     ` Sean Chang
2026-03-23 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] sunrpc/nfs: cleanup redundant debug checks and refactor macros Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260321141510.68214-3-seanwascoding@gmail.com \
    --to=seanwascoding@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox