From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] ovpn: fix race between deleting interface and adding new peer
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:45:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323184543.764a903e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323184304.42c3930f@kernel.org>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:43:04 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:03:51 +0100 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > While deleting an existing ovpn interface, there is a very
> > narrow window where adding a new peer via netlink may cause
> > the netdevice to hang and prevent its unregistration.
> >
> > It may happen during ovpn_dellink(), when all existing peers are
> > freed and the device is queued for deregistration, but a
> > CMD_PEER_NEW message comes in adding a new peer that takes again
> > a reference to the netdev.
> >
> > At this point there is no way to release the device because we are
> > under the assumption that all peers were already released.
> >
> > Fix the race condition by releasing all peers in ndo_uninit(),
> > when the netdevice has already been removed from the netdev
> > list and thus an incoming CMD_PEER_NEW cannot have any effect
> > anymore.
> >
> > At this point ovpn_dellink() becomes empty and can just be
> > removed.
>
> This looks like a step in the right direction but AI points out that
> it's not enough:
On second thought I wonder if the fix will not be to move the flush
even later. So please fix the AI-reported issue in the same submission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 10:03 [PATCH net 0/1] pull request: fixes for ovpn 2026-03-20 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-20 10:03 ` [PATCH net 1/1] ovpn: fix race between deleting interface and adding new peer Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-24 1:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-24 1:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-24 10:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-24 21:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-24 22:40 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-25 13:37 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-26 9:13 ` Sabrina Dubroca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260323184543.764a903e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox